alan_rfc_27
Member
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2009
- Messages
- 32
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Been using the 10.3 Complete Dominance classic version. The offense in this is phenomenal, but the defense is kinda leaky.
Then used the same 2 mid and front 3, but the back 4 and DM from the Nike defense.
Much larger difference in goals allowed but even more goals.
Look at the differences in the two league tables.
Also some amazing results.
Used it myself with Atletico and the results are below.
Rusty Dan used it with Portsmouth and left some good comments.
Please try the tactic! Also report back to improve the tactic.
http://www.sendspace.com/file/772es1
Look at my coaching staff guide aswell.
http://www.fm-base.co.uk/forum/f72/9-or-10-star-staff-t38174.html
Then used the same 2 mid and front 3, but the back 4 and DM from the Nike defense.
Much larger difference in goals allowed but even more goals.
Look at the differences in the two league tables.
Also some amazing results.
Used it myself with Atletico and the results are below.
Rusty Dan used it with Portsmouth and left some good comments.
That will do nicely!
Struggling with Portsmouth, sitting mid table with my own bodged tactic.
First try with the bad boy and I beat Man City in the 3rd round of the FA Cup 4-0!!!!
Arsenal in round 4 next.....
Most impressed and I like SAF loves strikers! I can play with 3 lol
Top work!!! (H)
Ok.
The most notable difference so far is the attempt of throughball, alot more frequent. The reliance on middle striker is higher and he tend to score more (Eg. beat porto away from home 4-2, with middle striker scoring all 4).
2 games played now (didn't have much time) and scored 9 goals. First game with this tactic against Preston was 4-2 win the next match was Crystal Palace with a stunning 5-0 win. I am pleased with this tactic.
Please try the tactic! Also report back to improve the tactic.
http://www.sendspace.com/file/772es1
Look at my coaching staff guide aswell.
http://www.fm-base.co.uk/forum/f72/9-or-10-star-staff-t38174.html
Last edited: