Recent content by dair

Too bad that they happen frequently and you missed the very last lines of my OP. If they happen occasionally I would have no problem but once every 2-4 matches is simply retarded. @Joel Define a shot on target. In fact for every shot on target you show me, I will show you a clear cut chance.

Why not? What you judge to be a shot I might consider a cross. What if the winger tries to cross towards the goal from the byline and it goes by the post? Was that a shot or a cross? Debatable.

Same thing can be said about shots/shots on target/saves/virtually any other stat other than possession. @ChrisBird He is a barcelona regen

Huh? Private chat regarding finishing training? Do you change your PPMs often? I basically look at the player stats and tell him to learn a PPM based on his stats and keep it forever.

Agreed, the thread title was somewhat misleading. But things ARE going my way. We win, from corners, free kicks, from screamers. We win competitions, trophies. We defend well. We create chances. The only problem is strikers not scoring when on the break. It happens so often that you just want to...

I don't understand why you can't define CCCs. Your striker is one on one with the keeper - clear cut chance. Any other and that is a half chance and not counted. If there is no other players between your striker and the GK then its clear cut. How is that so hard to define? EDIT: I get that the...

Whats the point of Total shots stat? They are only computer generated outcomes that are represented via visuals Whats the point of Shots on target stat? They are only computer generated outcomes that are represented via visuals Whats the point of Possession stat? They are only computer generated...

Thats exactly why I'm complaining. Too many chances = LOW CONVERSION RATE for one on ones. Otherwise imagine if my strikers put in at least 1/2 of them. That would mean we won each game by like 5+ goals. How else am I supposed to judge a chance? All I can see is a blue ball moving towards a...

Yes its realistic. but it can be improved. I can't tell you how many times I've been Wenger'd in the last minute. Penalties, headers, stupid Gk. But the point is that I don't care because I always see this types of goals in real life. Chicharito, Kalou, etc. They always happen. What I don't see...

The CCC stat is not useless. Count the amount of chances that are one on ones you get (the ones you actually watch via the match screen) and you will relatively get the same amount. The game IS NOT fixed against me. In fact, I can win the league with Wolves in the first season. No problem. The...

Thats all? Rotation and PPM are the only solution you offer? Drogba. Regen in OP. Torres. Anelka. etc. There is plenty of rotation and I'm well aware of PPMs. **** I could probably buy Higuain just for the heck of it to add more competiton but they would still miss the same amount of chances...

@Joel I would be happy for you to explain the fault in the tactics. Here a typical example of my game via pictures. [/URL] Uploaded with ImageShack.us[/IMG] Opponent is purple, I am red. Their player takes the throw in but my defender reacts quickest and hoofs the ball upfield to my...

14 games for Torres - guess how many chances (CLEAR CUT OR NOT) he had. I only saw 4-5 legitimate scoring opportunities for him during his Chelsea career. Torres relies on precise through balls which the Chelsea team CANT do. They rely on a completely different system and Torres just doesn't fit...

Lee - no one is being biased here. Well certainly not me. (unless subconsciously) I started tracking stats from my matches and I need about 3x shots on target/CCC to win. I can say with all honesty that I've never had a keeper rating go over 7.9 unless we absolutely dominated a game but the...

Come on, what kind of response is that? SI always spends time and puts passion on a videogame thats supposed to simulate real life football management. They do a good job but a game can never become truly "real". But what they can do is avoid such things from consistently happening. I'm sure...