Recent content by DeliciousStory

I am not discrediting creators. I am checking whether the label matches the data. Showing a genuine save proves the run happened. It does not prove that words like broken or unstoppable are accurate overall. That is the whole point of Claim vs Reality.

Even if you do not see those as strong titles, I do, and that is my personal judgement. So I do not really buy the conflict of interest point. You use labels like meta, broken or unstoppable, but somehow others are not allowed to check whether those labels actually hold up because you think...

You keep changing the subject. First it was “awkward”, then “advert”, now “views”. None of that changes the actual point. You used a strong public label like unstoppable. I tested whether the data supported it across broader environments. That is fair. Showing a genuine save proves the run...

There is no serious answer to that without context. If you ask what I personally prefer, I usually go for control-possession tactics.

Super League's runs : If you do one run only, or pick the best outcome, all you are really showing is that a tactic can look great when the run goes your way. If RNG goes against it, the level can drop a lot. As you saw, this tactic had some very strong runs and some poor ones. That is exactly...

Everything is explained in the "index" Tab of the google sheet. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OEf3X29iRkvnA5Y1UAQny7PaQdVBNN0j1ETF7AgwuVw/edit?usp=sharing

Leeds x 5

Usually people on FMBase complain when Patreon content gets shared, which is why I did not post it straight away. But since you asked, here it is. The file is called AAA1 because it is part of an automated process, and FM26’s finder is not great. I also included the file the server uses here...

We gonna see how those data diverge from mine then :) This arsenal x 5 edited, didn't upload all 5 can compare data here : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OEf3X29iRkvnA5Y1UAQny7PaQdVBNN0j1ETF7AgwuVw/edit?gid=0#gid=0

Going to post results about that for next claim vs reality episode :)

I test claims, not people. If the data does not back the label, the label is wrong. Regarding the source, it comes from the old FMBase test league. I just reworked it to make it more logical and less painfully slow to run. Since you are posting here, I assumed that setup was considered...

Hey, all good. Claim vs Reality is there to give people better insight when a tactic is pushed with big claims. Arsenal is one 5-run simulation, just like Leeds. The FMBase-based (super league) test league is simply another environment, updated to make it more logical. So, is it broken...

Found this tactic on FMScout. The results were very good with Arsenal, but less convincing with Leeds. It collapsed in a controlled test environment. Overall, it feels like after the update, everything is more RNG-driven and harder with underdog teams. For more data:

🔥 FM24 343 STRIKERLESS – Season 1 with Milan 💯 101 points 🏆 Scudetto, Coppa Italia, Supercoppa 😈 Pulisic + Leão as Shadow Strikers ⚙️ No strikers, no mercy 📥 Tactic download + full setup: 👉 https://www.patreon.com/posts/fm24-343-135848572 #FM24 #FootballManager #Strikerless #DeliciousFM

🛠️ FM24 TEAM BUILDING GUIDE Forget the tactic hype – learn how to build your team first. ✅ Squad structure ✅ Role balance ✅ Smart transfers ✅ No wonderkids needed 📺 Master the basics like a pro: 👉 #FM24 #FootballManager #DeliciousFM If you want to try the tactic that i did used for...