Recent content by dimakouv

  1. D

    date! 442 (from the chicken wing author) someone struck gold

    Man I just refuse to play with those OIs from the new tactics :P the last lingering slice of realism in FM would be gone... @Kelevra - I personally found date! to be more stable. But in FM16 it really depends on the team and especially how the AI sets up against you; so you can try both on your...
  2. D

    date! 442 (from the chicken wing author) someone struck gold

    I'm using OIs from the Paris tactic, these seem to be more stable. I felt the original OIs came unstuck against some formations, leading to you losing big. Still not convinced whether it's better to use any OIs at all tbh, but the Paris tactic ones seem allright in any case.
  3. D

    Core2FM Tactic Analysis - Yes Another Testing Thread

    Just to say great work mate; the most convincing testing method so far, and an enjoyable read overall :)
  4. D

    Don't make this mistake and don't test tactics this way...

    Just to add a bit more balance to the responses, I'm also fully with Will. I have used a number of tactics in FM over the years, and have always found Will's testing results to most closely resemble my own playing experience. Even though his method has some vulnerabilities, they affect all...
  5. D

    DEVASTATOR!

    Me neither, but clearly it is working for some people. By the way, I've never yet tried a tactic, on this FM or previous versions that performed poorly when not fluid but suddenly started performing well when fluid. It either clicks straight away, or starts of with a few solid displays - draws...
  6. D

    Clusterquack FM16 - Control Narrow 433

    Used it in League 1 with good success (managing Oxford City, fourth season). Managed to get promoted even though it was a bit lucky (lots of draws and a few tight 1-0 wins at the end; total of 82 points after 46 games), but my squad is probably one of the worst in the division so it's definitely...
  7. D

    FINALLY NAILED IT! NEVER LOSE AGAIN! Works home and away

    This tactic is ****. Tried it with Chelsea for 2 games and am still battling relegation. This would never happen IRL.
  8. D

    [16.2] Vanco's flat 433 : SUK SAM

    Have been playing lower league, starting in Blue Square South with Oxford City, and this tactic has been by far the best for me. I also tried Devastator and Sir Goalalot but those did not work as well: Devastator not at all (v10; probably works better with good teams) and Sir Goalalot was...
  9. D

    Most Comprehensive Tactic Test in FM-Base History

    TFF's tactics have been poor for me in FM 2016 though, not sure how it's been for others; so I don't find the results that surprising. Of course, it's good to see him trying things out and improving things, but I find the TFF tactics are trying to use similar ME-breaking techniques from FM 2015...
  10. D

    4-1-1-3-1 OsmOze - Offensive and agressive tactic

    My favourite tactics on this patch so far, plays really nice football and results are good. Thanks very much! :)
  11. D

    Am I the only one who would rather not see these "game breaking" tactics

    Agree with yankee, looks like some people want different things from the game. For me winning every game 5-0 or 7-0 etc would be super-boring. Especially when you have a squad of Crystal Palace not Bayern, and when your tactic produces weird playing patterns which nevertheless make you win. And...
  12. D

    Am I the only one who would rather not see these "game breaking" tactics

    Agree with the OP actually. But also feel a bit silly complaining. I mean people are creating game-breaking tactics, it's not like anybody forces me to download them; the temptation is just too high... But in the end it ruins the game a bit, just winning every game with the same unrealistic...
Back
Top