Recent content by Igneos79

  1. I

    Help me design my favorite formation scheme

    that formation is good for passing through defence style, because it features a decent number of triangles, so that's how I'd play it. More fluid and less agressive, lets say fluid counter.
  2. I

    Tactical Changes or Patience?

    I would use a formation with nobody in DM or WB position. Structured, counter, shorter passing, play wider, higher tempo, deeper line, close down more...roles like sks, fbs, cdd, cmd, wma or wa, ama, and dlfs...or any other nonroaming role provided you keep these duties...
  3. I

    Tactic creation guide by Igneos Eructid

    So, the best way of creating a successful tactic is to have all elements involved fit like a lego. A setup in which players will be doing the most natural things. It is also important to notice that, by using simple math, any change you make must work when mirrored. I'm getting ahead of myself...
  4. I

    Igneos Eructid's tactical thread

    Made one defensive, one counter, one control and one attacking tactic. Pick your flavor! Cheers!
  5. I

    Igneos Eructid's tactical thread

    New set of 2 tactics released. Enjoy. Cheers!
  6. I

    Igneos Eructid's tactical thread

    No, CFs roams, and roaming roles fit very fluid, not fluid. Assistant does everything for me. I still havent learned about proper set pieces setup.
  7. I

    Bayern Munich 4-2-3-1 Counterattack (season 2012/2013)

    No. Basically, because of fluid fluidity. In a fluid setup, CM must do more then just the basic, which is support. He must not just support, he must also attack or defend. Attack duty would be in someone elses space, so two defend duties is a must. I guess you could change the roles, as long as...
  8. I

    Bayern Munich 4-2-3-1 Counterattack (season 2012/2013)

    this is my tactical setup. The other one is from the author of this thread. I'm pretty sure Osram used a DLPd and BWMd and a DFs, and perhaps an Apa or IFa, I just made a no nonsense version and it's working quite well. My beleif is that push higher up has more then one purpose. The first is to...
  9. I

    Bayern Munich 4-2-3-1 Counterattack (season 2012/2013)

    I don't like it, to be honest. Both tempo and passing are too high, you will lose the ball too much. Exploiting flanks might work if opposition gets 2 red cards for their sidebacks, or they are very poor. Work ball into box will slow you down, so would perhaps fit shorter passing and lower...
  10. I

    Bayern Munich 4-2-3-1 Counterattack (season 2012/2013)

    What the Rest of Europe Can Learn from Bayern Munich's Tactical Mastery | Bleacher Report says here he played a higher line
  11. I

    Bayern Munich 4-2-3-1 Counterattack (season 2012/2013)

    I have no idea how bayern played, to be honest, but if you play deep with a counter mentality, you can expect a lot of longshots in your net. I simply made what makes tactical sense to me. For me, counter differentiates from control like brain differentiates from brawn. Seems logical to use...
  12. I

    Bayern Munich 4-2-3-1 Counterattack (season 2012/2013)

    I've been experimenting with arsenal, and made a few changes. Trashed Liverpool 5-1 with this
  13. I

    Igneos Eructid's tactical thread

    It would ruin it, methinks.
  14. I

    4-2DM-3-1 Pass To Win [Need Help]

    flexible standard...no TI's. SKd, 2FBs, 2CBd, 2DMs, 2Wa, AMa, DLFs
Back
Top