Recent content by ralphs

  1. R

    REAVER !

    Interesting interpretation. Does this mean that cutting in from the right flank is now a bad PPM? I can see how cutting in would decrease the number of crosses flying in from the right.
  2. R

    REAVER !

    Is there a typo in the OP? I see the following:
  3. R

    Giving it Laldy

    Looking forward to your new tactics. I do appreciate that you actually take your time to test before releasing. It's almost like you respect your audience :)
  4. R

    Tactic Testing System by TFF

    Looking forward to your test of TFF Dev9. Would you also please add a column for points per game? Thanks!
  5. R

    Tactic Premier League 16.2 (Testers Welcome)

    Smart move adding more data points and ranking by average PPG. Thank you Will & team.
  6. R

    DEVASTATOR!

    GS 16.2g is out FWIW.
  7. R

    Tactic Testing System by TFF

    Not necessarily the bottom fodder--how about teams that are of similar or slightly lower rep? My understanding of your current testing is that you only have higher rep teams.
  8. R

    Tactic Testing System by TFF

    I agree. Thanks to TFF, my QPR side has won the PL three times back to back. Now teams are playing defensively against me all the time due to my higher reputation. With Devastator v6, I find myself sometimes being caught on the break by sides playing defensively. Obviously, this can happen to...
  9. R

    DEVASTATOR!

    TFF, would you please take the time to evaluate the defensive tweaks posted in the last few pages? Thank you.
  10. R

    Tactic Testing System by TFF

    Some quick meta-analysis (points per match). Tactic TTF Test Lang/Fran/Luc Test TFF Dev V6 2.22 1.85 Laldy DMs high 2.03 2.10 MrL 4-4-2 HM2 1.94 2.03 Mahluk 1 1.66...
  11. R

    Giving it Laldy

    Chrissy, what PPMs are best avoided when buying new players? I imagine you don't want the wingers to cut inside, the F9 to try to break the offside trap, etc.
  12. R

    Tactic Testing League

    Would you please test Mahluk 2.1 as well?
  13. R

    Tactic Testing League

    Very interesting methodology. I would not be surprised that FM results are more probabilistic than not, but like you alluded to, even a statistically valid conclusion in this scenario is impractical until more diverse opponents are tested.
  14. R

    Tactic Testing League

    Would you consider testing the top tactics twice to see if their results are repeatable or just variance?
  15. R

    DOOMBRINGER!

    These two statements seem to conflict. Would you please update your filters to reflect the attribute changes you've made?
Back
Top