We won't get it because Fifa like to be the nice people who are doing all these countries a favour by letting them host the World Cup. Did South Africa get it because they made the best bid? Probably not, but it looks good for Fifa because they're helping the country develop.
Here's something useful, although slightly out of date: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/eng_prem/8902975.stm
So according to that, Stoke have the most although it doesn't include transfers from this week.
I don't think it's a clever move at all. Yes they could end up winning titles, but he could either be on the bench or sold by the time that happens. If it doesn't happen this season, then there's another round of big spending and he could find his position under threat.
City don't have to spend the money but it's a very difficult decision for a manager. The owners want big names and big signings, as they think that will be the way to gain success. They're not prepared to wait, bring in young players and build. They want instant success and don't care for...
Barely finished higher and what's wrong with fans showing their feelings? When a starting player who has been at the club most of his life leaves for a smaller club, then I think fans have the right to be a little bit upset.
Wrong. Firstly, why would Villa accept that when they turned now a £20m cash bid? Secondly, it's been reported by most news outlets as £18m + Ireland. As for Milner, I thought he had the sense to reject a move, but it seems not. I don't see how anyone would want to sign for City. Yes he might...