300 mil to spend

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bakestar
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 15
  • Views Views 4K
B

Bakestar

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2013
Messages
473
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Hi I am starting a save with my team Fulham, I have won everything with them in previous save's and i have also made Eastleigh the best team in the world in another save.

For this final save before FM15 im using the editor to make the mighty FFC super filthy rich and make a brilliant team straight away.... coz usually i miss out on all the top players :(

Please give me your recommendations for my super team.. If you mention Messi, Ronaldo or Emile Heskey i will call you a ****!

Thanks in advance :)
 
Why would you make a thread like this knowing it won't work anyway? Buying 11 first team players and trying to get them to work will take a few years - by which point they're no longer the same players.

Instead of editing money - why didn't you edit the players straight in? Same/same.

So yeah.

Having said that I suggest Emile Heskey.
 
Well im not gonna by 2 new players just gonna buy a few, and i won the Skrill South signing my whole team that year :)
 
I feel ya.

Having the same problem myself. Gave United 200m (supposedly matches their real life budget) and because there's no CL, choosing the right signings is a right pain in the ****. I even edited players in, like that guy said up there and it just felt dirty. You want the achievement of having them as your signings, I can relate.

I would say Drogba, or Eto are good starting options. Ashley Cole, Lampard and Valdes. They're on free transfers (if you're using LFCMarshall's latest). Because they're world class, that should boost your clubs reputation and pave way for more potential signings like them. I had a Hull save once, made their reputation 10000 (Highest) and I still couldn't sign anyone, but once I started signing easily signable, big rep players, the better guys came easily after.

Lucas Romero, Eder Alvez Balanta, Ben Arfa, Robinho. Danilio, Maicon (Porto) Axel Witsel. You could probably even go for Nani, given how bloated United's current squad are. Zaha is an absolute beast played in the right position.

You could boost your clubs reputation in the editor and edit some world class scouts in and just have a free-for-all.
 
GryWlkr said:
Having the same problem myself. Gave United 200m (supposedly matches their real life budget) and because there's no CL, choosing the right signings is a right pain in the ****. I even edited players in, like that guy said up there and it just felt dirty. You want the achievement of having them as your signings, I can relate.
Click to expand...
You don't feel dirty adding 200m or 300m through editor but you feel dirty adding players?

I don't compute.
 
alexdesouza said:
You don't feel dirty adding 200m or 300m through editor but you feel dirty adding players?

I don't compute.
Click to expand...

Because there is a challenge element in being able to successfully sell your whole squad and bring in a brand new one. Then you've got to deal with that constant fluidity bar getting lower and lower as each player is signed. That makes your winning chances deteriorate. No Champions league? doesn't matter if you're the best club in the game, your chances of signing a world beater are slim and even if they were interested, they might ask for massive wages, agent fee's, the club selling might over-price.

Why have one consistent save where you're not cheating and exploiting the fun ways the play the game, anyway?
 
I don't know why so many people have this moral high ground, just answer the lads question. I recommend Gabriel Iancu.. he's so good. :3
 
GryWlkr said:
Because there is a challenge element in being able to successfully sell your whole squad and bring in a brand new one. Then you've got to deal with that constant fluidity bar getting lower and lower as each player is signed. That makes your winning chances deteriorate. No Champions league? doesn't matter if you're the best club in the game, your chances of signing a world beater are slim and even if they were interested, they might ask for massive wages, agent fee's, the club selling might over-price.

Why have one consistent save where you're not cheating and exploiting the fun ways the play the game, anyway?
Click to expand...
WHAT?

None of that made sense.

I suggested the boy edit in the players as there is no chance of him signing "the best players" he's been waiting for as he mentioned he never gets to sign them. Without UCL or reputation, they won't come. 30m, 300m or 3b. Then you come in and dismiss my idea because it feels "dirty" yet suggest he adds an exuberant amount of money because "there is a challenge element in being able to successfully sell your whole squad and bring in a brand new one". Ridiculous.

There is no difference between adding 20m through editor or signing a 18m player with 2m in direct contract fees.

You've said a lot without actually saying anything (correct).

;)

By the way, don't assume **** you don't know about other people. I spent the first 3-6 months exploiting the backend of this game to see how it works. Low and behold? It's exactly the way I thought it would be and it's NOT PRETTY. It shows a major lack of understanding by people and organisations but I digress. I don't enjoy cheating personally but that doesn't have any relevant place here. It's an opinion. I'm simply saying that the user has edited in 300m, he isn't going to get the same players he wants, just edit in the players and it would essentially be the same as signing them after editing in stupid money.

Anyway. I'm dealing with 12 year olds and retards half the time on here so I give up.

I suggest Emile Heskey. GO nuts brah.
 
alexdesouza said:
WHAT?

None of that made sense.

I suggested the boy edit in the players as there is no chance of him signing "the best players" he's been waiting for as he mentioned he never gets to sign them. Without UCL or reputation, they won't come. 30m, 300m or 3b. Then you come in and dismiss my idea because it feels "dirty" yet suggest he adds an exuberant amount of money because "there is a challenge element in being able to successfully sell your whole squad and bring in a brand new one". Ridiculous.

There is no difference between adding 20m through editor or signing a 18m player with 2m in direct contract fees.

You've said a lot without actually saying anything (correct).

;)

By the way, don't assume **** you don't know about other people. I spent the first 3-6 months exploiting the backend of this game to see how it works. Low and behold? It's exactly the way I thought it would be and it's NOT PRETTY. It shows a major lack of understanding by people and organisations but I digress. I don't enjoy cheating personally but that doesn't have any relevant place here. It's an opinion. I'm simply saying that the user has edited in 300m, he isn't going to get the same players he wants, just edit in the players and it would essentially be the same as signing them after editing in stupid money.

Anyway. I'm dealing with 12 year olds and retards half the time on here so I give up.

I suggest Emile Heskey. GO nuts brah.
Click to expand...


"Anyway. I'm dealing with 12 year olds and retards half the time on here, so I give up."

"By the way, don't assume **** you don't know about other people."

"You've said a lot without actually saying anything."

"None of that made sense."

"I suggested the boy.."

"Ridiculous."

" It shows a major lack of understanding by people and organisations.."

View attachment 362957
 
alexdesouza said:
WHAT?

None of that made sense.

I suggested the boy edit in the players as there is no chance of him signing "the best players" he's been waiting for as he mentioned he never gets to sign them. Without UCL or reputation, they won't come. 30m, 300m or 3b. Then you come in and dismiss my idea because it feels "dirty" yet suggest he adds an exuberant amount of money because "there is a challenge element in being able to successfully sell your whole squad and bring in a brand new one". Ridiculous.

There is no difference between adding 20m through editor or signing a 18m player with 2m in direct contract fees.

You've said a lot without actually saying anything (correct).

;)

By the way, don't assume **** you don't know about other people. I spent the first 3-6 months exploiting the backend of this game to see how it works. Low and behold? It's exactly the way I thought it would be and it's NOT PRETTY. It shows a major lack of understanding by people and organisations but I digress. I don't enjoy cheating personally but that doesn't have any relevant place here. It's an opinion. I'm simply saying that the user has edited in 300m, he isn't going to get the same players he wants, just edit in the players and it would essentially be the same as signing them after editing in stupid money.

Anyway. I'm dealing with 12 year olds and retards half the time on here so I give up.

I suggest Emile Heskey. GO nuts brah.
Click to expand...

Why do you talk like you're better than everyone else? And i'm honestly not sure why you feel like you're 'dealing with 12 year olds and retards', i've never felt like that on here. If anybody here is acting immature, it's you. You've completely disregarded what this post is about, and not even tried to contribute.
 
Well that escalated quickly, all i wanted was some recommendations......

I am not adding players because i want to sign them myself, just for ***** and giggles.
 
That's a good team mate you should have bought Balanta and youd have a World Class CB for years and years Timo HOrn from Koln for 3.8 mil and ron Robert zeiler (sp) for 5.5
 
Balanta is on the bench :) Hangeland is a ledge so he will stay lol

bench:

Balanta
Briggs
Riether
Hughes
Stanicu
Rotariu
Mitroglu
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top