A problem with Alternative Tactics

  • Thread starter Thread starter mp84
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 2
  • Views Views 1K

mp84

Member
Joined
May 22, 2010
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Hey all,

Got a question, but why is it that every time I switch player positioning around in an alternative tactic it also switches the positional players of the Main tactic I'm using?

Example:

My main tactic is a 4-3-3, with 2 MC and 1 DM, however I want to set up my alternative tactic to be a 4-2-3-1, so I move one of my Midfielders who can also play AMC to that position.

Than when I go back to my 4-3-3 tactic, I find my DM has swapped places with that MC I moved to the AMC position in the alternative tactic.

I switch it back to their proper place in my Main Tactic, but it goes ahead and automatically adjusts my alternative tactic at the same time and instead puts the DM now as the AMC instead of the MC like I had before.

In other words, the tactics are not unique, and seem be linked to each other.

Is there anyway I can unlink them? As honestly it's really annoying that changing positional players around in my Main Tactic all of sudden effects the Alterantive Tactics too.

I've tried unique naming each tactic too, but that didn't help keep the specific tactics unique and still all get affected if I make a change in one of the tactics.

Hope this made sense, if anyone has any ideas on how this can be fixed, I'm all ears.

thanks,
 
So,

No one has really encountered this situation or have just simply learned to deal with it?

If I can any inquiry into this, it would be awesome, lol...

thanks :)
 
It comes from how the tactic was first made. For example, if somebody started with a 442 in the tactic creator, but dropped one striker to amc in one tactic, and dropped the same striker to dmc in another tactic, when you switch between the two you will get the amc and dmc switching for example.
 
Back
Top