Accomplished positions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lidfinder
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 3
  • Views Views 2K

Lidfinder

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2009
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Two questions, firstly, how much worse (if at all) will a player play if he is played in a position in which he is 'accomplished' as opposed to 'natural'? An example which I find crops up a lot is if you play an AMR (such as walcott) in MR.

The other is linked, is it a)possible and b) worthwhile to train a player for a position from 'accomplised' to 'natural'
 
I can't say ive noticed much difference ive played arteta attacking right wing since i signed him and hes been playing well.
 
i dont think it matters too much to be honest, ive played walcott MR before and he was immense, plus in my villa game ive got ashley young on the left ML and thiago neves on the right RM in a 442 formation and theyre both tearing it up, even though there natural positions are AML and AMR....spose it depends on the player really.....
 
i think it depends on the player itself,
maybe we can see and know on their attribute,

MR need better skill in defence than AMR
MR will often go back while AMR just sometimes
 
Back
Top