advise a beginner on how to develop this tactic

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ylli
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 6
  • Views Views 1K
Y

Ylli

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2010
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Hello, i'm posting to ask for some tips and direction in trying to create a tactic devised for a possession based
game but focal point being the lone striker who i rely on to score goals and assist the the three behind him. In realistic terms, i guess the closest team to play in this style would be arsenal.
Problems i'm having here is the striker tends to not get enough of the ball so we struggle to create CCCs in attack and when we defend unless i apply team instructions such as drop deeper, we are waaaaay to open at the back.
Can anyone direct me in term of team instruction, player roles and instructions.
FYI for player instructions, i have the CF to move into channels and my goalkeeper to distribute to defenders.
Thanks.
View attachment 425878View attachment 425877View attachment 425876
 
i would say if you want a possession based game you'll need playmaker(s) able to keep possession under pressure, BBM don't do that i would pick a DLP. If you want your striker to be a goalscorer it is better providing him of an attack duty and if you want to use the trequartista try with an AF with the IF/S :)
 
Bomber1 said:
i would say if you want a possession based game you'll need playmaker(s) able to keep possession under pressure, BBM don't do that i would pick a DLP. If you want your striker to be a goalscorer it is better providing him of an attack duty and if you want to use the trequartista try with an AF with the IF/S :)
Click to expand...
I appreciate the advice, say im not adamant on a trequartista, what role would u play there instead? And would u still keep both wide players on IF-A?
Also, what team instructions wud u recommend considering i want to keep possession without wasting time on the ball so chances are created?
 
Ylli said:
I appreciate the advice, say im not adamant on a trequartista, what role would u play there instead? And would u still keep both wide players on IF-A?
Also, what team instructions wud u recommend considering i want to keep possession without wasting time on the ball so chances are created?
Click to expand...
i like more the AP/A in that position, the IFs on attack duty are more suited for scoring if you have them on support they will create more chances for the striker, having the IFs on support means that you need WBs behind, if you prefer keep the FBs then i would use Wingers. for the instruction you can try this
View attachment 425855
you will have possession and chances. however the base can be solid but you have to change your approach game by game, it is vital in this edition ;)
 
Bomber1 said:
i like more the AP/A in that position, the IFs on attack duty are more suited for scoring if you have them on support they will create more chances for the striker, having the IFs on support means that you need WBs behind, if you prefer keep the FBs then i would use Wingers. for the instruction you can try this
View attachment 487249
you will have possession and chances. however the base can be solid but you have to change your approach game by game, it is vital in this edition ;)
Click to expand...
Wow nice thanks, whats ur view on a three of: IF -A AP-A and W-S?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top