Ancelotti sacking 'bad for game'

[BBC Sport]

Chelsea's sacking of manager Carlo Ancelotti is "damaging to the game", according to the head of the League Managers' Association Richard Bevan.

More...

 

[StuW]

Roman needs to leave the football side to the men who know about it. His philosophy is splash cash and it will sort itself out. It took SAF 13 years before he got a team to win the Champions League. Chelsea need to show faith and keep one manager at the club so he can mould a squad and style over a period of time rather than sacking when they finish 2nd.

 

[DMF]

Bit of an exaggeration, but it was a poor decision tbh. But to be fair, we don't know what happens behind the scenes, so there may be other reasons behind his sacking..

 

[StuW]

The main reason is that Roman still hasn't managed to buy club football's biggest prize yet. I know a good trophy shop though.....

 

[W4FC B3N]

He probably didn't help his own cause by saying the stuff he said before he was sacked, hinting that he was going to get sacked. oO)

 

[Alcaraz]

People keep going on and on about how Ancelloti was unfairly sacked, yes I am very sympathetic towards him but a blog on the Chelsea FC. website really expresses my opinion on why his sacking can be ably justified, a very good read it is too:

Blogs | The Cruellest Cut is Often the Kindest | Official chelseafc.com Blogs

 

[*Paul*]

Ancelotti shouldn't of been sacked, I think, although he was not that good, as people suggest. He is a good manager, though, and can bring stability - and trophies - in the long term, I believe. Roman Abrahmovic doesn't understand football, and has made some poor decisions in recent years. I'm thinking José Mourinho or Andre Villas-Boas to take over if Chelsea are willing to wait for a 'big name' manager, or maybe Paciencia (Braga coach, unlikely though) or they may poach a manager from a 'smaller club' for a sum of money.