Hi Guys,
Not sure if this has been asked before but here it goes:
Let's say I'm playing in the Finnish league or the Gibraltarian leagues which has around 20-something league games compared to the Premiership or Serie A with 38 games. For arguments sake, the leagues reputation are equal and all clubs have equal training and staff etc.
Would this have an effect on player development or are the games weighted equally? So essentially it wouldn't matter in which league you are playing in - as the games in the league in which you play fewer games count "more" towards their development?
Would this ultimately be balanced across the game?
My thoughts fwiw - it would make sense to me that player development would be based on league reputation (or quality of the league) and also training/coaches. Based on league reputation - the total sum of the league games played in a league (or even the number of minutes played) would contribute to a players development as a percentage.
For example -
Premier league club development - potential development for the season is 100% (maximum stat growth based on the players CA/PA) based on the league overall reputation.
If a player played the full season 38/38 games or 22/22 games this would be classed as a percentage - 100% of potential development
Likewise if a player played only half a season 19/38 games or 11/22 games this would be classed as a percentage - 50% of potential development.
Where as a league with a lower reputation receives a lower maximum potential development even if they play all of the games or if there are a fewer number of games.
If a player played the full season 38/38 games or 22/22 games this would be classed as a percentage - 80% of potential development
Likewise if a player played only half a season 19/38 games or 11/22 games this would be classed as a percentage - 40% of potential development.
This would then lead to factoring in the level of facilities, coaching staff and potential injuries.
In conclusion, I would assume given that a league's reputation is equal to another and the level of facilities and coaching staff are equal then the total number of games in a league would not really be factored in.
Thoughts?
Not sure if this has been asked before but here it goes:
Let's say I'm playing in the Finnish league or the Gibraltarian leagues which has around 20-something league games compared to the Premiership or Serie A with 38 games. For arguments sake, the leagues reputation are equal and all clubs have equal training and staff etc.
Would this have an effect on player development or are the games weighted equally? So essentially it wouldn't matter in which league you are playing in - as the games in the league in which you play fewer games count "more" towards their development?
Would this ultimately be balanced across the game?
My thoughts fwiw - it would make sense to me that player development would be based on league reputation (or quality of the league) and also training/coaches. Based on league reputation - the total sum of the league games played in a league (or even the number of minutes played) would contribute to a players development as a percentage.
For example -
Premier league club development - potential development for the season is 100% (maximum stat growth based on the players CA/PA) based on the league overall reputation.
If a player played the full season 38/38 games or 22/22 games this would be classed as a percentage - 100% of potential development
Likewise if a player played only half a season 19/38 games or 11/22 games this would be classed as a percentage - 50% of potential development.
Where as a league with a lower reputation receives a lower maximum potential development even if they play all of the games or if there are a fewer number of games.
If a player played the full season 38/38 games or 22/22 games this would be classed as a percentage - 80% of potential development
Likewise if a player played only half a season 19/38 games or 11/22 games this would be classed as a percentage - 40% of potential development.
This would then lead to factoring in the level of facilities, coaching staff and potential injuries.
In conclusion, I would assume given that a league's reputation is equal to another and the level of facilities and coaching staff are equal then the total number of games in a league would not really be factored in.
Thoughts?