Dual Tactic Sets - Why so limited?

[macca72]

I was reading through Bantons thread (http://www.fm-base.co.uk/forum/share-download-fm-16-tactics/352281-4-2-1-3-bantons-prl-testing.html) and it struck me that there's a case for tactic developers to start thinking more about 2 different tactics, one for home and one for away.

There's lots of talented tactical developers on this forum, so open question, why do you guys not think about Home / Away as separate conditions and start to develop multi tactic sets?

Cheers

 

[Destro]

It's a tactic sharing forum... why did you post it here?

Go to any other appropriate forum and post it there.

P.S. I really don't understand why people create random threads here...

 

[macca72]

It's a tactic sharing forum... why did you post it here?

Go to any other appropriate forum and post it there.

P.S. I really don't understand why people create random threads here...

Why wouldn't I post it in the forum where all the tactics creators are most active?

P.S I don't really understand why some peoples first response is to criticise.

 

[wkdsoul]

Most do, and have been doing since FM10. as well as time wasting versions, and tweaks for when you go down to 10 men, or need to find a goal.

 

[Flohrinho]

I would suggest a different approach to home and away.

Instead of going by where you play you should go by who you play. Generally you will meet two kinds of teams. Those who press and those who sit deep. Because of this I noticed that it works best for me to have a tactic that deals with the more aggressive teams and exploit the gaps they leave as well as having a more patient approach against teams that sit deep around their own box to draw them out.

Two tactics like this should allow you to respond to most tactical threats really well if you can read the game well enough to realize when you should use which tactic.