Financial fair play regulations, thfc, enic & transfers explained in full

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mike.
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 22
  • Views Views 4K

Mike.

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2009
Messages
31,888
Reaction score
31
Points
48
Cheers IanC for the link: http://www.footballtransfertavern.c...lations-thfc-enic-transfers-explained-in-full

This is an extremely well written, informative and relevant piece. It comes from Glory Glory and specifically a poster who goes by the user-name of Intrepid.
The lethargic nature of the transfer market across Europe has little to do with lack of desire or urgency for any Clubs to strengthen their squads. The overriding issues are financial and regulatory.


All Clubs are fully aware that the Financial Fair Play Regulations are going to determine both their wage and transfer budgets – the main sticking point is going to be the wage budget of each and every Club and the vast majority of Clubs are now preparing for the future and the players (and agents) are fully aware of the fact that within the next 2 to 3 years the wages of the majority of players will decrease.

As an example, any player currently on £100k pw on a 5 year contract will struggle to get that type of deal either now or in the future (unless they are in top 20 of world players) so they will stay where they are unless Manchester City come in for them (and Manchester City cannot buy everybody and only have this window and the next to splash the cash as they have been).

The 2 Milan Clubs, Barcelona et al are all cutting their wage budgets substantially – they all have to move players on but the players will not move – why should they? They are still on contracts that were signed pre regulatory times.

Many of you will have seen different articles and interviews (even our very own Manager) stating that loan deals will be the order of the day with some big players moving on but only if the selling Club pays a proportion of the players wages.

This will be the start of the sea change happening in the football world. Players and agents know that the easy money of yesteryear is now going so they will hold onto their precious contracts for as long as they can. Another issue that has always been to the fore is the fact that Spanish and Italian Clubs have been calculating wages on the net sum – coupled with the differing levels of taxation vis a vis the UK then trying to get a player from either of those leagues has always proven to be problematic.

As far as THFC is concerned, it is an absolute myth that we do not have the money to enter into the transfer market or that we lack desire to get top players in – we will always strive to get the best players in but the regulations change for everybody and it would be reckless to go and sign 2 or 3 top players on long term contracts (which the players and their agents will demand) if those transactions mean we break the Regulations in 2 years time.

What is the point of doing that – sign the Galacticos and then not be able to play in the CL as we make a trading loss? If we could get 2 top players on short term contracts (2 years) and it took £150k pw each to get the players then be assured that Levy would do it. If we were 100% assured of the exact date for the new stadium opening (higher revenues) then we could go for longer term contracts but as we don’t know for certain then how can we jeopardise our future? Another issue is the 25 man squad for both PL and UEFA competitions – Clubs have to sell players before they can buy due to having too big a squad – if the players will not move then what can the Club do? The only chance in that scenario is for the selling Club to pay a proportion of the player’s wages and either sell or loan the player.

As a THFC example, if we want to sell players such as Jenas and Bentley, and they have many suitors outside of the so called Top 4, then who can afford their wages with the new regulations? Do they move on to smaller wages or do they sit tight with higher money on long term contacts at THFC? What will their agents tell them to do? As with every other Club, if we want to bring players in then we have to free up a squad place first – that is not easy in this current climate. Everybody is sitting on their hands waiting for the other guy to blink and IMO it will be the Spanish and Italian Clubs that blink first and some big names will come to the PL on seemingly ridiculous low amounts. Milner moving to Manchester City will start some movement but if we are indeed after a so called top player then he would be more likely to come from Spain or Italy.

As crazy as it may seem, it is entirely possible to see the likes of Ibrahamovic or Huntelaar move away on loan deals. The agents will revolt of course but market forces, as ever, will win the day. In short, when we hear that THFC (or any other Club) has to sell before they can buy, it is not due to the fact that we are skint or that Levy wants to give out a big Dividend – it is due to the aforementioned points. As has been posted on numerous occasions, ENIC does not make any big money until the Club is sold and their valuation will only be achieved with regular CL football and by our competing for all honours. If we can get 2 top players at a high cost on a short term venture then it will be done – what will not be done is putting the Club in jeopardy by unsustainable spending.

Please be assured that although ENIC (TG) holds the majority of shares and voting rights, there are some seriously big hitters as shareholders (e.g. Lord Ashcroft and Mike Sherwood) – both of those guys have invested 6 figure sums into the Club and they know they only get optimum value with on the pitch success so they are pressurising Levy at all times. Sherwood in particular has the financial clout (and backing of his Company) to ensure a suitable buyer for the Club (hence the strong rumours of who is going to have the naming rights for the stadium), so everybody is pushing for “instant on the pitch success” but market forces are unstoppable, even for THFC.
 
Well put. So some hope of getting back Football to norm. I love financial fair play rule.

Thanks for sharing this.
 
Hopefully we will see less clubs going the way Portsmouth and Leeds have with this sort of finanacial mindset in place.
 
Good post. I understand chunks of that already, but it opened my eyes regarding the sales of certain players. Didn't really occur to me that they wouldn't want to move, if they were earning more with us, despite not playing.

We're quite fortunate in that our average wage is pretty low, considering our status as top-four challengers, compared to the teams around us.
 
Good post. I understand chunks of that already, but it opened my eyes regarding the sales of certain players. Didn't really occur to me that they wouldn't want to move, if they were earning more with us, despite not playing.

We're quite fortunate in that our average wage is pretty low, considering our status as top-four challengers, compared to the teams around us.

Yes, Spurs got good wage structure. When someone like Modric is earning 70K, club is doing many things correctly.
 
It's 100% true.

I expect a flurry of activity as the window closes and squads need to be registered, why select your 25 until you have to?
 
This is what Manchester City are going to have to deal with. Its already started with Ireland demanding money to move and can see more players doing the same if a club wants to move them on.
 
ManCity have tough task in balancing books. Even if they win trophies, the amount of money they are spending on wages is too big to cover, plus city stadium is not full every single game either.

They will have to pay lot of compensations for their players to leave.
 
ManCity have tough task in balancing books. Even if they win trophies, the amount of money they are spending on wages is too big to cover, plus city stadium is not full every single game either.

They will have to pay lot of compensations for their players to leave.
very true, they are unwilling to sell to rival clubs, but these are the only ones who can come anywhere near the type of wages they are offering
 
ManCity have tough task in balancing books. Even if they win trophies, the amount of money they are spending on wages is too big to cover, plus city stadium is not full every single game either.

They will have to pay lot of compensations for their players to leave.

So true, and another thing they have to contend with is a little known rule that allows players to apply for their contracts to be terminated if they play in less than 10% of games they are available for. This is one of Wenger's main gripes with regards to the new 25 man squad rule, but it should stop more wealthy teams gazumping their rivals in the transfer market just because they can.
 
So true, and another thing they have to contend with is a little known rule that allows players to apply for their contracts to be terminated if they play in less than 10% of games they are available for. This is one of Wenger's main gripes with regards to the new 25 man squad rule, but it should stop more wealthy teams gazumping their rivals in the transfer market just because they can.
did not know this. i wonder if mancini knows this... if not he could be in for a very unpleasant suprise
 
So true, and another thing they have to contend with is a little known rule that allows players to apply for their contracts to be terminated if they play in less than 10% of games they are available for. This is one of Wenger's main gripes with regards to the new 25 man squad rule, but it should stop more wealthy teams gazumping their rivals in the transfer market just because they can.

That's interesting Carine. Could you link me to a copy of the rules in full please? Because that's received little to no coverage if true.

Another interesting thing about the 'Financial Fair Play' rules is that they only apply to European competitions. We may well see teams blowing money to win domestic competitions but then being refused entry into the Champions' League. That's a nasty can of worms for UEFA and the national leagues to keep a lid on. The alternative is that ultimately the big European clubs head off and play themselves for all eternity (as they've threatened to do in the past - and why the CL was altered in format to try and ensure their qualification).

It's all a bit of a mess really. There does need to be sanity in football - not least in ensuring clubs aren't running up bills they can't pay (I class injections of equity well outside this though...) but sometimes the cure is worse than the disease.
 
An interesting read - cheers for posting it. Hopefully no clubs will end up like Pompey with the financial fair play regulations. It'll be interesting to see how long it takes for the wages to drastically reduce too.
 
This is the rule concerning the 10% contract termination...

FIFA Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players.

Section 15
Terminating a contract with sporting just cause
An established professional who has, in the course of the season, appeared in fewer than ten per cent of the official matches in which his club has been involved may terminate his contract prematurely on the ground of sporting just cause. Due consideration shall be given to the player’s circumstances in the appraisal of such cases. The existence of a sporting just cause shall be established on a case-by-case basis. In such a case, sporting sanctions shall not be imposed, though compensation may be payable. A professional may only terminate his contract on this basis in the 15 days following the last official match of the season of the club with which he is registered.

So in other words, if you ain't picked for the 25 man squad you can **** off at the end of the season and no one can stop you.
 
Last edited:
Just as an add on to the original post I found this.

http://www.spurs.vitalfootball.co.uk/article.asp?a=7505393
Written by GilzeanIsKing

THFC Financial Director interview
For Tottenham Hotspur`s finance director Matthew Collecott, it was the penultimate game of this season that carried potentially massive financial consequences.

When Tottenham played Manchester City, a Spurs win was guaranteed to land them a lucrative Champions League place by virtue of finishing fourth in the Premier League.

"If we were to qualify for the group stage of the Champions League, we could expect to earn around £20m from it," Collecott tells Financial Director. "And that`s almost all straight on to the bottom line."

A caveat though, as he points out, is that there is a level of certainty of revenues in football that helps FDs forecast.

"Most of the revenue is relatively stable and even the variables, like the merit award, are reasonably predictable," he says. "Away from the TV money, other deals such as sponsorship tend be tied down for three years."

Collecott is uniquely placed to appreciate the different regulatory regimes in other European markets as Spurs`s parent company, Enic, has owned several European clubs in the past including Slavia Prague, AEK Athens and Italy`s Vicenza - and Spurs is one of the only clubs with shares traded on the London Stock Exchange.

He has also represented Spurs on Uefa`s European Clubs Association (ECA) forum, which was responsible for drawing up Financial Fair Play and agrees that football faces ample regulation already.

He worries that more will cripple club management rather than help clarify their financial position.

"A lot of the ideas are good, but the challenge is not to make the rules so draconian that nobody can operate," says Collecott. "Take the idea of a break-even rule [which will become an obligation]: if you have seen the IFRS or GAAP rules, which are very weighty documents, you will realise that the idea that Uefa can just issue some simple rules is somewhat over-optimistic. But Uefa is going to impose more regulation on us, because it looks as if the other European clubs are absolutely hellbent on pushing it through. The playing field is going to change over the next few years."

Perhaps the new rules need their own roadmap, IFRS-style. The FD is mindful of cultural differences that could make uniform regulation difficult to enforce.

"Because integrity is so important in the UK, we take rules seriously," Collecott says. "But that is not always the case in Europe and we know that because we have operated there. There are exemptions and people don`t always adhere to the rules, so it is harder to do business. In some European markets, it is about how well connected you are and there is often a political dimension. So I`m slightly sceptical about how easily break-even rules can be simply formulated and whether they will be strictly adhered to."

He suggests alternatives such as a wages-to-turnover ratio, "which we do anyway, because our relationship with our banks means those are the sort of things we are covenanted on. So if we had four or five key multi-dimensional tests, I think that would work a lot better in practice than the proposed break-even rule."


The writer of the article then goes on to say.

The main reason was to show confirmation of the wages/turnover ratio - our wage structure has been brought into disrepute by all and sundry and has been continuously mis-represented. Now that it has been confirmed, from the horse’s mouth, that our wages are based on a % of T/O (the % is a maximum of 55%) I trust that it puts an end to the nonsense spouted about our wage structure. Please note what our FD says about the wage budget being a covenant with the banks - as a PLC we have to adhere to checks and balances – we are not a Private Company. Not only is our wage structure the most sustainable way of ensuring long term stability but it ensures that the monetary value of the budget increases when our revenues increase. It also ensures that it makes no difference at all to the accounts as to how that wage budget is spent – if we are able to release two players who are currently on £50k p.w. and bring in a top player on £100k p.w. it has zero effect on the accounts but has every chance of on the field success – with smaller playing squads and our increased revenues (and the % staying at a maximum of 55%) it will mean that we have more leeway when negotiating wages. Incidentally, none of this information is top secret – just invest in THFC (you only need to buy one share) and take a stroll along to the AGM (or EGM) and ask the questions – something I have been doing for over 25 years; long before Lewis, Levy, ENIC and TG came along onto the scene. On 3 occasions I have purchased a number of shares – flotation, 1996 shares issue (when money was required to maintain the stadium) and last year’s shares issue for the overall £15 million required for the stadium project – money required so as not to impede investment into the playing squad – because as has been stated many times, the funding vehicles for the stadium project are NOT part of the current operating revenues. If the voting of the other 20,000 shareholders is anything to go by, the vast majority fully support Levy and the way he is handling the Club. Do people really believe that the media or misinformed internet users know more about how the Club operates than the shareholders? Most of the shareholders are also long standing fans (since 1959 for me) who have put money into the Club to ensure its long term stability – those people want to know that investment is being made into the playing squad, and the infrastructure, to ensure that we can compete for the top honours without having to go through the traumas of the 80’s and 90’s when the Club nearly went bust on more than one occasion.
 
Last edited:
The Spurs poster quoted raises an interesting point - not sure he's got them accurate though.

When companies take out loans, as part of the agreement there are sometimes terms and conditions which relate to how well the business has to do or the loan will start to charge a higher rate of interest or even be liable to have to be repaid.

The Glazers at Manchester United have terms in their loans like this. As do Arsenal. As do Spurs. If they break those covenants then the consequences are similar to those reported to have happened with Glazer's PIK loans where the interest rate rose yet again in spite of Ronaldo being sold and it's going to cost a few tens of millions more when the PIK loans become due for repayment. Liverpool don't have them - our owners just can't afford to pay the interest full stop.

Said for a while that Spurs are on the very edge of what they can financially afford to do right now, but have had dog's abuse from some of their supporters who think that I'm saying they're not a well run club. What Spurs have done is gambled on getting into the CL under Redknapp. They need to maintain that position in the top 4 or they'll have to cut back down again - like Aston Villa are now having to do. That's why old 'Arry is whining so much about transfers and having to figure out who to sell in order to continue to buy.
 
Said for a while that Spurs are on the very edge of what they can financially afford to do right now, but have had dog's abuse from some of their supporters who think that I'm saying they're not a well run club. What Spurs have done is gambled on getting into the CL under Redknapp. They need to maintain that position in the top 4 or they'll have to cut back down again - like Aston Villa are now having to do. That's why old 'Arry is whining so much about transfers and having to figure out who to sell in order to continue to buy.

Very true. I think with Harry as well we have hit the glass ceiling as he says he wants this marquee signing which spurs fans are calling out for and realistically will have trouble getting until we are a regular Champions league team as the top players dont want to join us if we are not making the top four regularly.
 
Very true. I think with Harry as well we have hit the glass ceiling as he says he wants this marquee signing which spurs fans are calling out for and realistically will have trouble getting until we are a regular Champions league team as the top players dont want to join us if we are not making the top four regularly.
this is where spurs are very lucky they have a strong chairman in levy. it was at this situation leeds went for the gamble.... and we all saw how that turned out
 
Back
Top