Financial Worries for Barcelona

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mike.
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 28
  • Views Views 3K
Status
Not open for further replies.

Mike.

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2009
Messages
31,888
Reaction score
31
Points
48
FINANCIAL WORRIES FOR BARCA
By Press Association Sport staff

http://www.sportinglife.com/footbal.../10/07/07/SOCCER_Barcelona.html&TEAMHD=soccer

Barcelona president Sandro Rosell has revealed the extent of the financial worries at the club, admitting the players' wages for last month have not been paid.

Rosell formally succeeded Joan Laporta as president last week and and has already sold Dmitro Chygrynskiy to former side Shakhtar Donetsk for 15million euros to alleviate the club's "liquidity problems".

That move came as something of a surprise as, even though the defender had struggled for first-team football, coach Pep Guardiola had stated his intention to hold on to him.

But Rosell explained in an interview with Sport his administration were forced to act, both with that sale and by seeking further funds from banks.

"We found a club in debt, with liquidity problems," he said. "At this point we have to take a loan to pay the wages of the players.

"The squad were supposed to be paid at the end of last month and still haven't been.

"We'll fix a loan of 150million euros.

"The banks know that we have a business plan that will allow them to recover the money.

"The club is not bankrupt because it generates income."

However, Rosell insisted the situation was not a reason to panic.

"The members shouldn't be afraid because it is under control," he said. "We must resolve this tension.

"It can be done in two ways: to have extra income, like selling Chygrynskiy, and/or taking a loan, which is what we have done.

"The previous board had already begun this process. We followed the same path - the same banks, the same target but with a different business plan.

"They (Laporta's board) also knew they needed this credit.

"We hope to sign it this week."

Asked how a club with a turnover of 400million euros could be in such a predicament, Rosell said: "It has spent more than it has made."

Despite the financial situation - and the purchase of David Villa from Valencia - Rosell insists there is still as much as 89million euros to spend on new blood.

"There will be 50 million euros to sign more players," he said. "This is the case every year. This is our plan for the future.

"Technically, as of now we have 50 million plus 15 for Chygrynskiy and 24 for (Yaya) Toure. In total, 89million."

That may not be good news for Arsenal fans, who hope to see their captain, Cesc Fabregas, remain in London.

With former Barca youth player Fabregas seemingly keen to return to the Nou Camp, it has become the summer's protracted transfer saga.

However Rosell, who is due to travel to South Africa shortly, where he hopes to meet with Gunners boss Arsene Wenger, wants the issue sorted as soon as possible.

"It's now or never," he said. "We'll do it fast. It won't be protracted.

"I'll try to see Wenger in South Africa, then we'll tell you what happens.

"We would not pay the 50-60million euros that I have read about.

"If Arsenal do not go crazy, he might play at Barca."
 
Apparently, it's not actually Barca in financial trouble but the TV company that owns the right to show La Liga rights. However this could effect all La Liga clubs, Barca's loan is pretty much a safety pre caution to make sure they do have the money in case the TV company can't pay all the money to clubs.
 
barcelona fc hypocrisy at its finest

One interesting article about both Madrid's and Barca's net spending over two seasons.

Firstly, I would like to point at the transfer activities of both the clubs in the 2008-09 season:
Real Madrid purchased Rafael Van der Vaart and Ezequiel Garay in the summer and Lassana Diarra and Klaas Jan Huntelaar in the winter which took their spending to €68 million but the sales of Robinho, Soldado, and Julio Baptista got them €54.7 million. Their net expenditure, therefore, was €13.3 million.

Barcelona, on the other hand, spent €102 million in 2008-09 for Keita, Pique, Hleb, Caceres, Dani Alves, and Henrique, re-couping just €49.5 million of that through sales, leading to a net expenditure of €51.5 million.

Now let’s look at the much talked about transfer window of 2009-10 season.

Real Madrid purchased Kaka, Cristiano Ronaldo, Xabi Alonso, Raul Albiol, Karim Benzema, Alvaro Arbeloa, and Esteban Granero for a whopping total of €249 million.

The recent (stupid) sales of Arjen Robben and Wesley Sneijder, brought Florentino Perez’s sales figures to the magical number of €90.5 million (which he aimed for before starting the project). The net expenditure for this season, then, is €158.5 million.

FC Barcelona quite surprisingly spent over €100 million for the second year running, €129.5 million to be exact for Zlatan Ibrahimovic, Dmytro Chyhrynskiy, Keirsson, and Maxwell. Through Samuel Eto’o’s sale, they recovered only €30 million, leading to a net expenditure of €99.5 million.

So in the two seasons combined Real Madrid's net expenditure is €171.8 million and FC Barcelona's net expenditure is €151 million, just a €20.8 million difference between the two.

If the difference had been larger, Barcelona had every right criticise Madrid’s transfer policy, but the fact is they are very similar.

So much for Laporta's, "We create players not buy them, unlike Real Madrid" statement.



It has been three months since Real Madrid embarked upon their second "Galactico" era, and they have been facing ridicule and attacks from all around the globe ever since.

Yet while Florentino Perez has come under heavy criticism for spending "ridiculous" amounts of money in this transfer window, their great Spanish rivals FC Barcelona have somewhat slipped under the radar.

Indeed, everyone seems to have forgotten and "forgiven" Barcelona for spending profusely on a certain striker who goes by the name of Zlatan Ibrahimovic.

But the Director General of Real Madrid, Jorge Valdano, didn't:

"The church appears to be above religion. When they signed Ibrahimovic they didn't practice what they preached. It surprised me that they didn't apply the same rules as Cristiano Ronaldo to the Ibrahimovic transfer."—This is an excerpt from Jorge Valdano's interview which he gave two days ago to AS.

Just one day after Valdano's interview, the Catalan club purchased a 22-year-old defender—Dmytro Chyhrynskiy—from Shaktar Donetsk for €25 million, a significant sum for an established, world-class player, let alone a young, almost unheard of defender.

Had Real Madrid made the same signing, newspapers around the world would be condemning their transfer policies and Perez would no doubt come under scrutiny once again.

Barcelona, on the other hand, made the signing with no surrounding fanfare, and the move was barely reported in media outlets.


So much for calling Madrid as Cancer of football and Barca Model club.
 
Spot on Jack.

The TV Company owes them so much money in TV rights that they can't actually pay them, meaning Barca don't have the money to spend on players. They've taken out the loan to ensure that they can definitely buy the players and then they'll pay back the loan once they get the money from the TV company.

Simples.
 
Apparently, it's not actually Barca in financial trouble but the TV company that owns the right to show La Liga rights. However this could effect all La Liga clubs, Barca's loan is pretty much a safety pre caution to make sure they do have the money in case the TV company can't pay all the money to clubs.
to he honest it was stick rosell used to beat laporta over the head with in the elections
 
Spot on Jack.

The TV Company owes them so much money in TV rights that they can't actually pay them, meaning Barca don't have the money to spend on players. They've taken out the loan to ensure that they can definitely buy the players and then they'll pay back the loan once they get the money from the TV company.

Simples.

But if the TV company goes bankrupt then they're ******...
 
Barcelona will be fine. They're always fine.

You can bet they will continue spending too.
 
from the TV company..

If you read further up, I was meaning how would they pay the money back in the hypothetical situation that the TV company went bankrupt...
 
god i hope it goes **** up lol. just shows teams have to be extra careful these days.
 
Not surprised to be honest, they have like 10 players on more than 100k a week. But yeah they will be alright.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top