How much "better" is it to have a specific role - training?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kytz
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 5
  • Views Views 2K

Kytz

Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2011
Messages
238
Reaction score
0
Points
0
So.. I holiday:ed (or whatever it is called) a season on a new FM save & I forgot to select training methods (like, specific roles/attribute) so all the player went one season with "default" training methods,
how much does this affect the players/player attributes?

So.. "TL;DR": No specific training (leaving it be) vs Specific training (Specific role/attribute), how huge is the difference in attributes?

(Sorry if this is hard to read, but i'm pretty tired.. hope i make sense..)
 
I think 4-1-4-1 Rock TC is the best tactic for FM13 ever!
 
So.. I holiday:ed (or whatever it is called) a season on a new FM save & I forgot to select training methods (like, specific roles/attribute) so all the player went one season with "default" training methods,
how much does this affect the players/player attributes?

So.. "TL;DR": No specific training (leaving it be) vs Specific training (Specific role/attribute), how huge is the difference in attributes?

(Sorry if this is hard to read, but i'm pretty tired.. hope i make sense..)

I would think that the specific training is very important, in earlier FM versions I always loaded down training programs for different roles
 
Yes it is important, but it also depends on the players age and personality.
 
Personal training is a great way to develop and form players into suiting your tactical approach, especially if playing a more rigid approach, using defined specialist roles.

Just remember that this is to be looked at in a long term perspective and if only "forgetting " about if for one season, it wont have any major negative effect since it wont focus only on those stats highlighted by the role but instead, they will train that little extra on it on the cost on the other stats.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top