Hummels or Subotic?

Status
Not open for further replies.
C

celticfc482

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
Points
0
I though Subotic was the higher rated one, but FM rates Hummels higher, question is which should i buy, they are both around the same price?

Thanks
 
subotic. turns out to be a really great player. you could also try howedes
 
I'd go with Hummels although Subotic does have a slight height advantage. They are both very good tbh but Hummels just about nicks it. :)
 
In real-life it's Hummels but I couldn't say who turns out to be the better player on the game. However, whenever I've tried to sign Hummels, Dortmund seem very reluctant to sell him and I've made bids of £15M +.
 
Depends who he will be playing alongside. Subotic is a beastly stopper with excellent heading ability, whereas Hummels is faster and all-round better technically. Hummels is the better of the two in my opinion
 
I tryed to buy both for my Liverpool team but ******* City came in and bought Subotic before the transfer window and don't even play him. Although Hummels is and absolute monster.
 
Last edited:
il play him next to John Terry?

It sounds like i should buy both as they complement each other well, Subotic being the no nonsense defender and Hummels being the ball playing one?
 
Am i right in saying they work well together might buy subotic later on to replace terry then?
 
Hummels is the more talented one in real life as well as in the game.
 
Subotic is good, but Hummels is just better. all-round better
 
they're both very good but for my liking subotic is a little bit too slow. he's the better towering CB but hummels is more versatile and can play higher up the pitch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top