I cannot beat the top 8 - HELP ME!

  • Thread starter Thread starter hatestemur
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 12
  • Views Views 3K

hatestemur

Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2017
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
0
I've created my own tactic on FM17, but I'm having problems I do not understand.

I have managed to beat the mid-table and below teams with ease but against the top 6, I have only managed to scrape a point off of Arsenal and have lost against United, City, Chelsea, Tottenham and Leicester.

These are my results:
View attachment 110328

And my Team Instructions:
View attachment 110327

And my strongest XI:
View attachment 110326

Johnathan Tah is joining me in the Winter transfer season so he'd replace Sakho, and Kane in the summer for up top but if I don't get top 4 I'll probably get fired so won't make it to see him.

Since the beginning of the season, I haven't tweaked the tactic at all, I have only played with a counter mentality against Tottenham but that didn't change anything.

What can I do to improve my game against the big guys?
 
You only have 3 players with a defensive duty. This leaves you open to being attacked, especially away from home. I would call this tactic a very good 'home' tactic. I tend to have 3 different tactics. An attacking home tactic, a tough home/easy away game tactic and a hard away game tactic. My hard away game tactic such as against the top 6 would usually have at least 4 or 5 defensive duty players in it, and probably a defensive midfield player. If you think about it, in your tacttic shown above you're effectively playing with 4 attackers who will do absolutely no defending. When you're playing against a top team, who may be attacking you with 6/7/8 players at a time, you need to play a more defensive style in my opinion
 
I think also you are seriously flooding the central areas. I get that it is your wing backs who are giving you width, but with a striker, a BBM, an AP and 2 IFs you have 5 people who all want to be in the centre of the park, high up the pitch.

A DLP with an AP doesn't tend to work well, in my experience, as the DLP tends to claim the lion's share of possession. Plus with two IFs, their markers will drift inside and crowd the space that the AP needs, not to mention your BBM dragging his marker into that area and sturridge as a Complete Forward also willing to drop deep.

Now, you have width as well, through your wing backs, but this means that in the attacking phase you have potentially 7 players in the final third. Combine this with 2 BPDs and you have a recipe for disaster. It is nobody's responsibility to clear the lines, or to dominate the space between your defence and midfield.

Against poor teams, no problem. Your quality on the ball and high press will force lots of turnovers of possession in dangerous areas. Against big teams, let's take chelsea irl as an example: who is tracking hazard? If it is your CWB, who deals with the overlapping Marcos Alonso? You have no defensive midfielder to fill the space or help out.

To echo the above poster, your tactic will clean up against bad teams, and against good teams? Just think of all that space between your defence and attack for a number 10 to occupy ;)
 
I'm also seeing that you are extremely high scoring, with 36 goals in 17 games.

To put that in context, this season Chelsea have scored 42 in 20, Liverpool 48 in 20, and and Tottenham on 39 in 20. You clearly have a great tactic going forward, but you might want to look at how you deny space to number 10's or provide cover for your wing backs against wingers/overlapping full backs.
 
I think also you are seriously flooding the central areas. I get that it is your wing backs who are giving you width, but with a striker, a BBM, an AP and 2 IFs you have 5 people who all want to be in the centre of the park, high up the pitch.

A DLP with an AP doesn't tend to work well, in my experience, as the DLP tends to claim the lion's share of possession. Plus with two IFs, their markers will drift inside and crowd the space that the AP needs, not to mention your BBM dragging his marker into that area and sturridge as a Complete Forward also willing to drop deep.

Now, you have width as well, through your wing backs, but this means that in the attacking phase you have potentially 7 players in the final third. Combine this with 2 BPDs and you have a recipe for disaster. It is nobody's responsibility to clear the lines, or to dominate the space between your defence and midfield.

Against poor teams, no problem. Your quality on the ball and high press will force lots of turnovers of possession in dangerous areas. Against big teams, let's take chelsea irl as an example: who is tracking hazard? If it is your CWB, who deals with the overlapping Marcos Alonso? You have no defensive midfielder to fill the space or help out.

To echo the above poster, your tactic will clean up against bad teams, and against good teams? Just think of all that space between your defence and attack for a number 10 to occupy ;)

Thanks for your great feedback.

To widen the width of my team, I cant really remove my IFs as they are really good IFs. But if i widen my width in team instructions to fairly wide, and assign the AP to drift of to the wings do you think that'll create enough space for them?

To also help with cover, I was thinking to change the DLP to BWM in defend duty, do you think that will help or would that leave a gap in the middle when he drifts off to the wings chasing a player? If not, what role combinations should I go for in midfield to play Goretzka and any other person? I spent alot on Goretzka.

How can increase the number of defend roles? Should I change the CWB's to a more defensive role like a full back with defend duty? Wouldnt they be too defensive then?

Do you think playing faily high up the pitch has any effect on this? As top teams have usually fast attackers and could they exploit the space left behind due to insufficient cover?
 
You only have 3 players with a defensive duty. This leaves you open to being attacked, especially away from home. I would call this tactic a very good 'home' tactic. I tend to have 3 different tactics. An attacking home tactic, a tough home/easy away game tactic and a hard away game tactic. My hard away game tactic such as against the top 6 would usually have at least 4 or 5 defensive duty players in it, and probably a defensive midfield player. If you think about it, in your tacttic shown above you're effectively playing with 4 attackers who will do absolutely no defending. When you're playing against a top team, who may be attacking you with 6/7/8 players at a time, you need to play a more defensive style in my opinion


Thanks for your great feedback, too.

What do you think I should change up in my team instructions or player roles that suits my current first XI? Im not really a fan of having many tactics, I know manager IRL have usually 2 tactics they use, atleast but I want to stick to a single 4231.

Do you think bringing 1 of the 2 CM's to the DM position will help?
 
You can consider changing your WB or even FB if you want a more defensive role. Both roles do not roam so you have abit more stability. Another option is to drop your IF to the WM position. In that position, you can customise them as IF with the PIs.
 
Thanks for your great feedback.

To widen the width of my team, I cant really remove my IFs as they are really good IFs. But if i widen my width in team instructions to fairly wide, and assign the AP to drift of to the wings do you think that'll create enough space for them?

To also help with cover, I was thinking to change the DLP to BWM in defend duty, do you think that will help or would that leave a gap in the middle when he drifts off to the wings chasing a player? If not, what role combinations should I go for in midfield to play Goretzka and any other person? I spent alot on Goretzka.

How can increase the number of defend roles? Should I change the CWB's to a more defensive role like a full back with defend duty? Wouldnt they be too defensive then?

Do you think playing faily high up the pitch has any effect on this? As top teams have usually fast attackers and could they exploit the space left behind due to insufficient cover?

Against top teams, especially away from home, I'd consider dropping the AP for a DM. I'm a little bit biased, as to be honest I struggle to get APs to work on this game, but it would provide you cover at the back and create a pocket of space for your IFs to drift in to.

Also, if your IFs are good with the ball at their feet and with finishing, try them on attack (Coman?) if they are more oriented towards passing and creativity (Bernadeschi?) try them on support. For most game role I see the difference between support and attack as between sitting back vs charging forward. For IFs however this is usually the difference between running at defenders and shooting (Attack) and cutting inside and playing a pass (support).

If I was you I'd be tempted to change CWBs to just WBs. CWB is a strange role in the game that not many players can play to the full extent. You'd still have width from Wingbacks on support/attack as you need.

Playing high up the pitch does give your opponents space for through balls, and with quick attackers they will do damage. However if you want to be positive and win games vs the top teams, high press is probably still the way to go with Liverpool.

I'd say if you want to keep the AP, I'd not use a BBM, maybe just another centre midfielder holding position or on defend to give you some balance. Personally I don't like playing 4-2-3-1 away from home though, so I'm not the best person to ask ;)
 
I agree with gintonpar ^^ I dont think you'll ever beat the very top teams without a more defensive tactic, and an easy way of doing that would be to drop your CAM down in a DM position and lower the tempo of your play. But thats just my opinion
 
Mi
I think also you are seriously flooding the central areas. I get that it is your wing backs who are giving you width, but with a striker, a BBM, an AP and 2 IFs you have 5 people who all want to be in the centre of the park, high up the pitch.

A DLP with an AP doesn't tend to work well, in my experience, as the DLP tends to claim the lion's share of possession. Plus with two IFs, their markers will drift inside and crowd the space that the AP needs, not to mention your BBM dragging his marker into that area and sturridge as a Complete Forward also willing to drop deep.

Now, you have width as well, through your wing backs, but this means that in the attacking phase you have potentially 7 players in the final third. Combine this with 2 BPDs and you have a recipe for disaster. It is nobody's responsibility to clear the lines, or to dominate the space between your defence and midfield.

Against poor teams, no problem. Your quality on the ball and high press will force lots of turnovers of possession in dangerous areas. Against big teams, let's take chelsea irl as an example: who is tracking hazard? If it is your CWB, who deals with the overlapping Marcos Alonso? You have no defensive midfielder to fill the space or help out.

To echo the above poster, your tactic will clean up against bad teams, and against good teams? Just think of all that space between your defence and attack for a number 10 to occupy ;)

.
Requoting again, but the is my biggest weakness in the game. I just don't understand the positions well enough. I could be doing the same thing or worsemand not even realize it. A lot of the tactic guides I watch are good, but not as in depth as I need.

Any suggestions or required reading material to gain a better understanding?

Thanks
 
fluid team shape does not match so many specialist roles like AP DLP BPD...
single Central Forward shoud be a Su role like Mandzukic, and change AP to SS(like Muller) or he will distrurb IF's cut inside.

in fact, you'd better try my tatic, and you'll enjoy the life of playing FM& chatting with girls after you FMRTE some players' bad PPMs(coz you just can't train them to remove the bad PPMs).

http://www.fm-base.co.uk/forum/shar...elona-tiki-taka433-how-2-win-all-matches.html

enjoy
 
sturrige F9

coman lIFs italian rIFs

asensio CMa
biglia APs

german DMd

gaya WBa sakho CDd german CDd englishman WBa

rulli SKs
 
Last edited:
Mi

.
Requoting again, but the is my biggest weakness in the game. I just don't understand the positions well enough. I could be doing the same thing or worsemand not even realize it. A lot of the tactic guides I watch are good, but not as in depth as I need.

Any suggestions or required reading material to gain a better understanding?

Thanks

I think when it comes to creating tactics there are two things you need to know.

A) The basics of positioning, tempo and pressing
B) In all likelihood, you will not create as strong a tactic as you can find from the people who test theirs and post online, and this is not anything necessarily to do with your football knowledge


I will address B first.

Currently the best performing tactic that has been simulated over a number of seasons is a 3 4 3, available here Mr L Tactics - 3-4-3 Watford System V2

This is a great forum in general, as people submit their tactics and this dude runs sims to test them before putting them here Mr L Tactics - in a league table.

But to examine point B, let’s go through the best performing tactic, the Watford 3 4 3.

This tactic has two wing backs on attack, a two man central midfield, a poacher and 2 false 9s. To an extent I consider this a ‘game breaking’ tactic. Not because it is so broken that you win every game (you don’t), but because it essentially ‘games’ the match engine, without referencing trends that are relevant in actual football. This tactic makes all teams over perform, with Watford winning the league without signings in the first season, for one player (allegedly). Let’s go into this in a bit more depth, so we can examine how unrealistic it is.

Firstly, there is a two man midfield, with one of those players oriented towards creativity as a DLP on support. The false 9s rarely track back in the same way that say, Willian or Pedro or Hazard might have to for Chelsea, where they play as inside forwards. The two man midfield can work, but usually where it is successful it works with 2 sitting midfielders. Herrera & Carrick, Wanyama and Dier, Matic and Kante, with additional tracking cover from inside forwards/wide players.

There are no wide men in the Watford tactic. One of the central midfielders is a playmaker. Wing backs provide the majority of assists, and yet don’t get caught out on the break despite pushing so far forward there are times you are playing with 5 strikers.

False 9 is an extreeeeemely specific role, probably only properly applying to Messi playing in a strikerless Barca, Pedro in a Chelsea without Diego Costa, David Villa or Fabregas up front for Spain, or other such examples. This Watford tactic has two False 9s. Two. What does this even mean?! On the pitch, they look like interchanging deep lying forwards. They often switch places with your poacher, who, contrary to his role description, drops back to shoot from range or play through balls to your Wing Backs.

What I am getting at, is that FM, much like real football, doesn’t play out according to what is written down. I suspect what is really important about the Watford tactic is the philosophy, the pressing style, and, to be honest, breaking the game engine. What I think happens is that your false 9s drift all over the place, pulling the defence out of position, and for some reason are tracked by full backs. This allows your wing backs acres of space to drive the ball across goal. Because you move the ball so quickly in the game, you can get the ball accurately up to your forwards with a decent degree of regularity. In real life, very few teams play 3 up front, and if they do, they play with 3 in midfield so they don’t get swamped.

In the game however, the midfield is bypassed swiftly, as long as your DLP as good passing accuracy, and you often have a 5 vs 4 at the edge of the opposing penalty area.

Long story short: there is ‘understanding the game’, and ‘understanding what is game breaking’. In this version of FM, I’m seeing a lot of tactics with False 9s, a lot of tactics with attacking wing backs and a lot of tactics with 3 up front. Almost every successful tactic plays a high press with short passing, so this is quite similar to real life at least. The False 9s and 3 up front? Less so (unless you count players like Hazard and Mkhitaryan as strikers).

What I tend to do is download a successful tactic like the Watford one, using it as my main tactic, and then create a separate tactic to have fun with, or for more defensive games for example. In my current save I use Watford and then spent ages creating a deep lying counter 442 for playing tough games away from home, and that was a lot of fun. For me the best part of the game isn’t necessarily the tactics, it’s the squad building and almost ‘role playing’ of a successful manager. Bringing through young players etc. After my current season I’m going to spend the whole off season working on a new core tactic of my own, so I’ll go back to Point A!

I think positioning is really important. The worst tactics I have created involve players stealing eachother’s space and clumping up. Understanding the player roles is important because you need to know where your players ‘want’ to go. An Inside Forward and an AP can work, but be aware that there will be instances they will be using eachothers space, i.e. between the lines in front of the back four. There will also be competition between say, a DLP and an AP. At one point I had a Regista, a DLP and an AP and then finally realised I had gone insane and went back to basics. Space, tempo and pressing. Just read the role descriptions and try not to have the lads hog eachother’s space.

Apologies for the essay!
 
Back
Top