I need help, no idea what is going wrong.

  • Thread starter Thread starter SickStory
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 9
  • Views Views 2K
S

SickStory

Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2015
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Points
0
I'm dominating games so hard, but I just keep drawing or narrowly losing. I watched some of the games and most the times my players just don't finish, I even signed Higuain in the Jan window to try carry me but nope, **** ton of misses and low ratings.

imgur: the simple image sharer Tactics and some results.
 
What's your match training set to maybe try attacking movement if you aren't already
 
What kind of game do you wish to play? Counter or possession? A winger is more suited to counter game, while inside forward to possession...I guess you could mix both, but only one of them will flourish...it would also be advisable to use a false nine or treq if wanting to play possession. A defensive forward, deeplying forward and shadow striker would be better for counter game. In both cases, you should exploit the flanks and use overlaps, not the middle...
 
Well, let me put it this way, If you want a treq, you want to roam, which means using very fluid team shape. If you want to use very fluid team shape, you should be using raumdeuters, as they also roam. If you want to use two inside forwards, they really shouldn't be tracking back, as they are mostly attack minded, which means in that case you can't use a fluid or very fluid team shape, which means you will need another player at defence, making this formation bad to use. A flexible 4-5-1 with a false nine and inside forwards, or a very fluid 4-5-1 with treq and raumdeuters, would be much better. This formation is more suitable to a counter attacking approach.
 
Last edited:
The wide players can't be set as inside fowards in a 4-5-1 though... Do you mean the 433? I thought the 4-2-3-1 was for possession style not counter?
 
Last edited:
I mean 4-1-2-3 DM Wide or 451 or 433 as you wish...
 
Well I just beat Man U 5-0 using 4-1-2-3 DM Wide with very fluid and two RMDs and a Treq, although this seems more counter attacking then the 4-2-3-1. Would I still be able to get away using the same tactics but with that formation?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top