With the Raumdeuter expected to roam around the pitch and leaving his flank exposed to opposition's wide players, what sort of player role should the full back behind him occupy?
LFB/WB/FB/IWB/CWB and what duty for the same?
Also, what sort of duty should an IF on the opposite flank have?
and as such, the FB behind the IF?
As a result of the roles of the 2 full backs, what should the player in the DM strata be?
Regista? Half Back? Anchorman?
I see HB's tend to sit back, break opposition's play, go for simple passes and so on. ie, a typically no nonsens defensive minded player...
Regista is different.. he breaks in opponents plays, dictates his team's tempo, when in possession he moves higher up the pitch, drops deeper at times, albeit not as deep as an anchorman or a HB.. he would very comfortably pick the ball in tough areas and make something of it- pass to a player in a better area, create a chance somehow, or lastly, just clear the ball for the sake of it!
but does having the Regista with no defensive partner in the midfield negatively affect the team? As there would be no midfielder on a defend duty..
Or is the Regista even though with a support duty good enough to cater to the defensive needs of the game when the full backs make attacking runs?
Or would the regista find himself out of position to expose his defenders?
Or would a DLP or an Anchorman be better choices?
[SK(S)]
[FB?] [LD(D)] [LD(D)] [FB?]
[DM?]
[BBM(S)] [RPM/DLP/AP]
[RMD(A)] [ENG/TQ(A)] [IF(A/S)]
that's the line up, striker less.. AMC to be decided from the 2 choices, LCM also can be any of the choices...
LFB/WB/FB/IWB/CWB and what duty for the same?
Also, what sort of duty should an IF on the opposite flank have?
and as such, the FB behind the IF?
As a result of the roles of the 2 full backs, what should the player in the DM strata be?
Regista? Half Back? Anchorman?
I see HB's tend to sit back, break opposition's play, go for simple passes and so on. ie, a typically no nonsens defensive minded player...
Regista is different.. he breaks in opponents plays, dictates his team's tempo, when in possession he moves higher up the pitch, drops deeper at times, albeit not as deep as an anchorman or a HB.. he would very comfortably pick the ball in tough areas and make something of it- pass to a player in a better area, create a chance somehow, or lastly, just clear the ball for the sake of it!
but does having the Regista with no defensive partner in the midfield negatively affect the team? As there would be no midfielder on a defend duty..
Or is the Regista even though with a support duty good enough to cater to the defensive needs of the game when the full backs make attacking runs?
Or would the regista find himself out of position to expose his defenders?
Or would a DLP or an Anchorman be better choices?
[SK(S)]
[FB?] [LD(D)] [LD(D)] [FB?]
[DM?]
[BBM(S)] [RPM/DLP/AP]
[RMD(A)] [ENG/TQ(A)] [IF(A/S)]
that's the line up, striker less.. AMC to be decided from the 2 choices, LCM also can be any of the choices...