Why isn't this illegal?

Huck the Dog

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2011
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Points
0
After getting beat in an EPL match, I wanted to compare rosters and noticed that my opponent has only 4 homegrown players on its full roster or 25 players. My league rules say I have to have a minimum of eight. How are they skirting the rules? A few other EPL teams also seem to have full rosters without 8 homegrown players, too.
 
You can register a squad with less players if you don't have enough homegrown ones, like say 21 with 4 homegrown players?

Oh yea, how do you check other teams registered squads for the Premier League?
 
At the moment, the rule stops teams having more than 17 foreign players in their squad rather than forcing them to have 8 home grown players
 
Perhaps some of players on that roster are aged 20 or below, allowing them to play in the EPL without being registered...
 
A few if the home grown players may be in the reserve teams?

I think this must be it, but I think I don't understand how it works. Still seems a little fishy to me. On his first team, he has the full complement of 25 players, and only 4 home-grown. So he clearly has more than 17 foreign players (also fyi none of them are aged 20 or below). On his reserve squad, he has 16 players, 5 of whom are home-grown (though three of them are on loan to other clubs). But I thought the eight home-grown requirement was for the first team.
 
I think this must be it, but I think I don't understand how it works. Still seems a little fishy to me. On his first team, he has the full complement of 25 players, and only 4 home-grown. So he clearly has more than 17 foreign players (also fyi none of them are aged 20 or below). On his reserve squad, he has 16 players, 5 of whom are home-grown (though three of them are on loan to other clubs). But I thought the eight home-grown requirement was for the first team.

You can still be foreign and home grown if they've come up through an English club for three years between the ages 16-21.
 
Back
Top