Photoshop can prove anything with stills.
View attachment 366890
But this GIF is as clear as it gets.
View attachment 366889
2014 World Cup thread
- Thread starter LFCMarshall
- Start date
- Replies 3K
- Views 144K
Photoshop can prove anything with stills.
View attachment 366890
But this GIF is as clear as it gets.
View attachment 366889
Also he got away without any ban when he punched some Chilean(?) player during qualifiers.
Wish we still had players like Keane, Gattuso, Vieira to sort players like him.
epic terrorist
Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2010
- Messages
- 5,009
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
imagine if he did that to Keane, I reckon Keane would end up with a longer ban after his reaction
In a postgame interview with Uruguay’s Channel 10, Suarez said: “These are just things that happen out on the pitch. It was just the two of us inside the area and he bumped into me with his shoulder, and that’s how my eye got like this as well.
“There are things that happen on the pitch and you should not make such a big deal out of them.”
I think he is forgetting a major part of his actions on the pitch.
“There are things that happen on the pitch and you should not make such a big deal out of them.”
I think he is forgetting a major part of his actions on the pitch.
Its pretty shameful the way some people such as the Uruguayan media have come out in support of him. It's time football turned it's back on Suarez. Only way he will learn
LFCMarshall
YNWA.
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2009
- Messages
- 14,836
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
I think that is slightly unfair on Uruguay, them getting through was nothing to do with Suarez's actions this time
If anything it was a man who should have been sent off in the previous match
LFCMarshall
YNWA.
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2009
- Messages
- 14,836
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
No defending Suarez but the Daily Mirror putting a photoshopped picture on their back page is embarrassing. It is not exactly like they need to make the situation worse
They blamed English media for making this news and for some weird reason brought 1966 world cup goal into the equation. Whole country is deluded when you hear the players and manager's interview.
No harm in having some fun just like you find a section in Telegraph and Guardian for funny pics.
LFCMarshall
YNWA.
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2009
- Messages
- 14,836
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Not really, it's false and is a back page lead not some section for funny pictures
I see nothing wrong here. Some papers have funny section, Daily mail thought it's worth backapge.
Third time he has done it and it would be great if all the papers started printing it on backpages.
LFCMarshall
YNWA.
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2009
- Messages
- 14,836
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
No surprise there then
Exactly just like there was no surprise Suarez bit some player.
All this "he needs professional help" is just a sorry excuse to defend him after making the same mistake again and again and that is ignoring other cuntish actions.
LFCMarshall
YNWA.
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2009
- Messages
- 14,836
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Im not defending him, it's nothing to do with that. It is the fact as to why a national paper needs to lie to make a situation worse when there is no need. The evidence says it all
But of course, you wont agree and you'd want every paper to lie to make everything look worse
imagine if he did that to Keane, I reckon Keane would end up with a longer ban after his reaction
If Suarez did that to Keane or one of Keane's teammates, I'd actually have been worried for his career. Seriously.
Can't agree with this. The Telegraph or Guardian have a section for funny pictures that are labelled as such and are very clearly spoofs. The Daily Mail put on their back page a craftily doctored image that wasn't clearly labelled as fake (if indeed it was at all, I'm not sure of that specific). Simply put, that's borderline illegal for a reason. That's the kind of behaviour that gives journalists a bad name.
Not sure if I missed something here as I checked daily mail pics and the headline clearly says "[h=2]Suarez virals: Plenty to chew on here as fans poke fun at his latest controversy"[/h]
So I'm really not sure if I missed something. And I didn't say I want every paper to post fake pictures to make matter worse, just that I don't mind them posting the funny pics on backpages.
LFCMarshall
YNWA.
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2009
- Messages
- 14,836
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Essentially, theres a law against that. I can't quite remember what it's called - and I should because I learnt it only a couple of months ago - but essentially it's protecting people from prejudice, because planting a giant doctored image on your front/back page with a big headline about it and a tiny explanatory comment below can be massively damaging to someone's reputation if the person who sees it doesn't read the paper and instead just catches a glance. And it's a good law; my dad knows hardly anything about football, but he does pick up bits and pieces. He'd be exactly the kind of person to notice the headline and picture but not be bothered to look at the context. And that's why this kind of behaviour shouldn't be - and generally isn't - allowed. Wouldn't be surprised if DM get investigated for this.
Another newspaper Liverpool fans will boycott reading now because they say something negative about LFC.