4-1-2-3 Unbeatable Engine Exploiter by Hazza22299

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hazza22299
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 1K
  • Views Views 1M
on other saves this tactic has worked well,but on my blackburn save im getting battered 3-4-5-0 ,there poor and im finding it abit difficult..any suggestions on what to do?
 
would this work with a poor blackburn team>?

It was made for a poor Sunderland team last year so I think so, but it is very narrow and Blackburn have some decent wide players. I would say that the defenders at Blackburn are better suited to the ParkThePlane tactic.

All the while your team could be working on my tactic as backup and you could recruit some talented youngsters like Fierro who would fit perfectly into the tactic.
 
Last edited:
not tryed your tac yet hazza but have tryed the grid and thats awsome best 433 i have ever seen first year with man city won every thing even beat barc in cl final 5-0 and if your is as good as that it will be very well done
 
SI Forums! You need a top team for it to work tbh aswell!

Btw, are you no longer using Makaveli domination vs barca? what do you think about this tactic, do you think it is better?

Well, i can only use 3, and i use the hazza one, the original one and a TBH 451 wide, very good for low CA and high PA players (my B team).

Nevertheless, it was, for me, the best tactic in the game, but i used the striker exploit setting and the corner exploit, so....

About snap's, what are the main diferences between that and the orginial or Hazza spin-off? Can u bring it here?
 
Well, i can only use 3, and i use the hazza one, the original one and a TBH 451 wide, very good for low CA and high PA players (my B team).

Nevertheless, it was, for me, the best tactic in the game, but i used the striker exploit setting and the corner exploit, so....

About snap's, what are the main diferences between that and the orginial or Hazza spin-off? Can u bring it here?

Sorry i didn't quite understand were you talking about hazza's tactic of makavelli when you said "best tactic in the game"? I know you sent me your tweaked version which I still have saved but am yet to try it.

*Knap- he turned it into a 41113, it was a good tactic but i didn't manage to get the best out of it, however one of my friends over at SI had a lot of success using it, i doubt i could bring it over here tbh, i dont even think he uses this forum himself :S
 
regarding the match preperation - once your team is fluid @ formation - what level do you put defensive positioning at? very high still?
 
@Hazza

Yay, I have been OP'ed! I don't want to take any credit at all though as the team talks are 100% cragswfc's findings.
However, you might want to look at the layout again as you double posted on the OP.

Also, I have further developed my half time team talk, so change these two lines:

If a player reacts negatively then passionately tell him you are happy with his performance
No individual team talk to unresponsive players

to his:

If a player with a half time rating above 7.2 reacts negatively or is unresponsive then passionately tell him you are happy with his performance
If a player with a half time rating below 7.2 reacts negatively or is unresponsive then passionately tell him that you have faith in him

 
SCP 1ª época


XvQdy.png

nbjis.png

a09Mx.png

JJQAX.png

AMPh4.png

tmgEG.png

Gvikt.png

x6WAD.png

YvzRP.png

w4JLk.png
 
@Hazza

Yay, I have been OP'ed! I don't want to take any credit at all though as the team talks are 100% cragswfc's findings.
However, you might want to look at the layout again as you double posted on the OP.

Also, I have further developed my half time team talk, so change these two lines:

If a player reacts negatively then passionately tell him you are happy with his performance
No individual team talk to unresponsive players

to his:

If a player with a half time rating above 7.2 reacts negatively or is unresponsive then passionately tell him you are happy with his performance
If a player with a half time rating below 7.2 reacts negatively or is unresponsive then passionately tell him that you have faith in him


Cheers
 
Hazza

I noticed that AML/R's on the tactic are not automatically set with opp instructions to 'Show onto weaker foot'.... do you have a link to download the tactic with this already on, like in Tacktikzz version?

Steve

For some formations its not automatically on, I don't know why this is and it's the same for Tactikzz version too.
 
Yo Hazza could you help me out bro!! regarding the match preperation - once your team is fluid @ formation - what level do you put defensive positioning at? very high still?
 
Yo Hazza could you help me out bro!! regarding the match preperation - once your team is fluid @ formation - what level do you put defensive positioning at? very high still?
Match Preparation: Teamwork - Very High until fluid then Defensive Positioning - Average
 
Firstly, you say that I'm a ****** without knowing me or having anything to do with me at all. Slightly uncalled for I would say, especially for a moderator who's clearly power tripping. One piece of advice that I would give you is that perhaps you should be slightly more courteous towards new members so that they stick around. This will be my last post here, and I'm beginning to wonder why I even bothered in the first place. So you can celebrate! Hooray! There are only a select few FM communities that are worth bothering with.

Secondly, I've only released a handful of tactics during my two decades of playing the franchise so it's no wonder you've not seen my tactics. I am far more involved in the tactical thinking and applying of real world football philosophies; thinking outside of the box and releasing articles that perhaps enable brokensjnf8ewhce8.com to look at aspects from new angles. A little bird has informed me that you release plenty of tactics for Football Manager and that they are severely lacking, so perhaps you should invest some time in furthering your real world football knowledge, as it may help you.

Many things are thought but shouldn't be said; within one post you've effectively called me a ****** and a *****. How charming. I have opinions on many people involved in this gaming community and these opinions seem to be expanding month on month as people begin to show their true colours. One last piece of advice that I would give to you, is to be nice to people on your way up, as you might meet them on the way back down.

When you can construct sentences in an adult and mature manner, instead of throwing insults around, perhaps we will speak again. I doubt it however, because I don't really know who you are. Having said all of that I wish FM Base all the best for the future, so it's goodbye from me, and it's goodbye from him.

P.S - Sorry for diverting the content of the thread, but you can thank Raikan007, your moderator, for that.

It was an opinion which I formed about you from the first post I read, the one which you said that you did not care for this thread or anything.... I found that quite arseholish where Hazz gave you the credit where it was deserved and was extremely apologetic after your little outburst! I found that immature and pathetic and I have seen handful's of members like you, who claim that their tactic/system is the best thing since sliced bread. I have never once said I was a good tactician or EVER blown my own horn, members here can vouch for that, I merely mess around with tactics and try different things and allow people to use it how they see fit!

I can assure you that I can a construct a sentence, I have two degree's and run a very lucrative/successful company, but that's neither here nor there!

I said what I said because of the fact it had sounded like you had already made up your mind about never posting here again, which I found quite pathetic as you should be glad and proud that someone took your tactic and used it for one, then uploaded it to share it with others, even though he did make a few changes!

You say that you are a man of the world when it comes to football, why is it that you use a tactic that clearly takes advantage of the ME Exploits and still uses the Classic creator? Did Hazz make these changes to it or was it a ME exploit classic tactic already? I have not seen your original tactic, and to be honest, I really would :) so if you or someone could send me the link I would appreciate it.

I do apologize for calling you a ****** and *****, in hind sight I meant that you were acting like one, not really one as of course, I do not know you from a bar of soap!

Its just frustrating when good tacticians come to sites like this and just go ape **** about how incredible their tactic is and how its better than anyone's etc and we have had to deal with that in the past and then they get their backs up and throw a fit and **** off never to be seen again, even though they actually produce good tactics..

A little bit of modesty goes a long way and I hope that if you are a normal member, not like the person I was outlining above, I hope you stick around pal as we always welcome quality content here :)

I am not a horrible person at all, you can ask anyone here, I just dont like aggressive, cocky tacticians and do not take kindly to that :) so I do apologize if I was out of line and misinterpreted what you had said and prejudged you as a person!
 
Last edited:
How is this not a total rip off? It's practically the same thing, especially considering how devastating the original tactic is it makes no sense to take credit for good results here. If the other one sucked then fair enough but there's so few things here that are your own that it seems weird to thank people.

I understand that you gave credit but it deserves more than that. The title says you're the author despite the fact you contributed a very minimal amount to the tactic. Just about everything was done by someone else. It's not even an unbeatable tactic, which you claimed to have used so you could get attention. Attention for what exactly? Attention for someone else's already insanly popular tactic?

I'm not trying to be mean here but this is plagarism. What did you do here to alter the tactic that made it noticably better? Because the original is just as dominant as this.
 
Is there any playerfilter for the Grid System out there, or a nice person who can fix that?

Thankyou Tactikzz for sharing this and thanks hazza for uploading it.
 
How is this not a total rip off? It's practically the same thing, especially considering how devastating the original tactic is it makes no sense to take credit for good results here. If the other one sucked then fair enough but there's so few things here that are your own that it seems weird to thank people.

I understand that you gave credit but it deserves more than that. The title says you're the author despite the fact you contributed a very minimal amount to the tactic. Just about everything was done by someone else. It's not even an unbeatable tactic, which you claimed to have used so you could get attention. Attention for what exactly? Attention for someone else's already insanly popular tactic?

I'm not trying to be mean here but this is plagarism. What did you do here to alter the tactic that made it noticably better? Because the original is just as dominant as this.

I don't know where to start with that. I changed the team instructions dramatically changing how the team plays I have had MUCH better results with it than the original and I have apologised numerous times AND given credit. I originally put "Unbeatable" and in hindsight I would have changed that. It doesn't say unbeatable on the actual download as I am able to change that. I used the "Grid System" tactic because out of the 9 exploits I took advantage of, 3 of them were already on the tactic. Go away if you don't like it.
 
Last edited:
How is this not a total rip off? It's practically the same thing, especially considering how devastating the original tactic is it makes no sense to take credit for good results here. If the other one sucked then fair enough but there's so few things here that are your own that it seems weird to thank people.

I understand that you gave credit but it deserves more than that. The title says you're the author despite the fact you contributed a very minimal amount to the tactic. Just about everything was done by someone else. It's not even an unbeatable tactic, which you claimed to have used so you could get attention. Attention for what exactly? Attention for someone else's already insanly popular tactic?

I'm not trying to be mean here but this is plagarism. What did you do here to alter the tactic that made it noticably better? Because the original is just as dominant as this.

this is boring now, there has been a few people come in and say this!! you have no reason to come into the thread and start gobbing off!! he has tried to make the tactic better not take the tactic and not make any changes to it what so ever, then start saying its his! hardly plagarism isit, he has given credit to the original creator, so go winge somewhere else!!
 
It was an opinion which I formed about you from the first post I read, the one which you said that you did not care for this thread or anything.... I found that quite arseholish where Hazz gave you the credit where it was deserved and was extremely apologetic after your little outburst! I found that immature and pathetic and I have seen handful's of members like you, who claim that their tactic/system is the best thing since sliced bread. I have never once said I was a good tactician or EVER blown my own horn, members here can vouch for that, I merely mess around with tactics and try different things and allow people to use it how they see fit!

I can assure you that I can a construct a sentence, I have two degree's and run a very lucrative/successful company, but that's neither here nor there!

I said what I said because of the fact it had sounded like you had already made up your mind about never posting here again, which I found quite pathetic as you should be glad and proud that someone took your tactic and used it for one, then uploaded it to share it with others, even though he did make a few changes!

You say that you are a man of the world when it comes to football, why is it that you use a tactic that clearly takes advantage of the ME Exploits and still uses the Classic creator? Did Hazz make these changes to it or was it a ME exploit classic tactic already? I have not seen your original tactic, and to be honest, I really would :) so if you or someone could send me the link I would appreciate it.

I do apologize for calling you a ****** and *****, in hind sight I meant that you were acting like one, not really one as of course, I do not know you from a bar of soap!

Its just frustrating when good tacticians come to sites like this and just go ape **** about how incredible their tactic is and how its better than anyone's etc and we have had to deal with that in the past and then they get their backs up and throw a fit and **** off never to be seen again, even though they actually produce good tactics..

A little bit of modesty goes a long way and I hope that if you are a normal member, not like the person I was outlining above, I hope you stick around pal as we always welcome quality content here :)

I am not a horrible person at all, you can ask anyone here, I just dont like aggressive, cocky tacticians and do not take kindly to that :) so I do apologize if I was out of line and misinterpreted what you had said and prejudged you as a person!

Real men apologise-boys don't.

Your both great tacticians and i've enjoyed using both your tactics (and this tweak!)
Over the last few months the grid system and your possession tactic have got me playing the game again when it was starting to collect dust!

Steve
Raikan go on his site.
 
In my personal opinion the central striker role needs tweaking- too often does the central striker receive the ball too deep because he is the target man and then attempt to dribble round every single opposition player. Now this is ok if you have Higuain in my case who is a top class player who can dribble, but I can imagine lower quality strikers struggling.

I'm going to try it myself as I think it would be a very simple tweak.

It's an issue with one of 2 things or perhaps a combination of both.

a. The through ball setting needs to be increased
b. The cross setting needs to be increased
 
Back
Top