So I have to choose between two players fighting for the same position...
Comparing them I notice the young one is clearly has better attributes for the same role and also much cheaper...But then he is given only two stars for it while the worse senior player given 4 stars for no apparent reason and much more expensive to hire...
Clearly I want to choose the young one but wandering how come the senior player deserves his 4 stars while his attributes doesn't suggest that he is such a good player...
How is it possible for a player to get four stars which means he is superb for that position and role while his attributes don't indicate any of that superb suitability?
Comparing them I notice the young one is clearly has better attributes for the same role and also much cheaper...But then he is given only two stars for it while the worse senior player given 4 stars for no apparent reason and much more expensive to hire...
Clearly I want to choose the young one but wandering how come the senior player deserves his 4 stars while his attributes doesn't suggest that he is such a good player...
How is it possible for a player to get four stars which means he is superb for that position and role while his attributes don't indicate any of that superb suitability?