Call of Duty: World at War

  • Thread starter Thread starter Redrup
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 61
  • Views Views 6K
Anybody got map pack 3 and want to do **** Zombies? (XBOX 360)
 
Just got it recently.

I'm really enjoying it.
 
I play it sometimes mate :P for xbox. And alot of people are on playing the new zombies mostly though rather than the game.
 
BO is good enough for me, only play zombies these days anyway
 
I play it sometimes mate :P for xbox. And alot of people are on playing the new zombies mostly though rather than the game.

We should play sometime then.
I just mainly use the Arisaka.
I prefer the game, because it has a more 'war feel' to the game.
 
world at war is the best cod in my opinion
cant beat the stg or the carbine.
ill play with you boys sometime if thats sound
 
World at War is also one my most favourite COD games ever. The Russian campaign was awesome in many different levels, the zombies back then was very exciting to say the least..
Still my most favourite COD.
 
Personally I still don't think anythign beats cod 4but thats my opinion.

We should play sometime then.
I just mainly use the Arisaka.
I prefer the game, because it has a more 'war feel' to the game.

world at war is the best cod in my opinion
cant beat the stg or the carbine.
ill play with you boys sometime if thats sound

I'll get a game no problem with you guys add me GT: Alan bsfb 1690

I'm busy all weekend however I don't mind getting a game whenever we're on
 
Im going to pick it up today in game for 15 quid, then getting MS points and getting me some zombies to shoot.
 
Thought I'd give this a bump, rather than using the black ops thread/start a new one. I'm literally about to buy this from Steam, but there's something I'm not entirely sure about.

I've got an intergrated video card, Celeron Dual Core CPU T3100 @ 1.90 GHZ 1.90 GHZ, Mobile Intel 4 Series Express Chipset Family, 3072MB DDR2 Ram, 320GB HD, and Windows 7 Home Premium 32 bit.

The question is how well do you think it will run (if at all). I did google it, but I came across answers to a similar question that were quite frankly snobby as **** as the majority of people had top end gaming laptops/pc's and chose to insult rather than answer. So rather than have stupid answers, thought I'd ask here. I did use the YouGamers and CanYouRunIt tool, but it was giving strange readings by saying I only had 64mb vram, when it's not. I can run games like Oblivion, World in Conflict, WoW, Star Wars Empire at War and obviously FM (as examples). Would WaW run with resolution etc turned down?
Cheers for any advice-just don't want to waste £20 on a game I can't use

**little bump** (apologies but if possible need to know asap so can start downloading asap)

---------- Post added at 06:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:53 PM ----------

bump
 
Last edited:
Should hopefully be able to run it on low settings, not sure on what kind of performance you would get though. Should run decently as the game just uses an updated Quake 3 engine.
 
Last edited:

Done that mate. And it came up that I'm unable to use FM 11, Oblivion, Morrowind.......even though I've been playing them a good while now :S

Used to use the YouGamers one and getting the same results. Very strange. But other people are having the same problem as me.
 
Should hopefully be able to run it on low settings, not sure on what kind of performance you would get though. Should run decently as the game just uses an updated Quake 3 engine.

Good point about the engine. Plus as I've been playing Falcon 4.0 and Flight Simulator 9 pretty smoothly aswell with some the options tuned down.

---------- Post added at 06:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:52 PM ----------

What kind of performance do you get in Oblivion?

When I turn down the distance options, turn off shadows and stuff like that, the animation of other characters is nearly very smooth, and there's next to no jerkiness/lag
 
If you can do oblivion you should be alright i think
 
Very happy about that. To be honest, it's the gameplay I'm more bothered about the gameplay than the graphics, so I don't have any qualms about reducing resolution etc. Thanks for the help guys :)

---------- Post added 14/08/2011 at 12:16 AM ---------- Previous post was 12/08/2011 at 07:03 PM ----------

Happy to report runs well-just had to reduce graphics etc, and there's not much lag. Only downside is-online I'm utter *****. For every kill I get seem to die about 15-16 times lol. Practice required. O yeah-campers suck donkey balls
 
Last edited:
Happy to report runs well-just had to reduce graphics etc, and there's not much lag. Only downside is-online I'm utter *****. For every kill I get seem to die about 15-16 times lol. Practice required. O yeah-campers suck donkey balls

Haha, you'll get there eventually :) Only took my 2 years :P

Remember to capture objectives if you can't kill anyone otherwise I will rage at you in the chat.
 
If you got it for online, you could be disappointed. The sheer amount of cunthole's who hack the games are ridiculous. I love the game, but can't play it because of those queef's.
 
Back
Top