Carlos Fierro vs Mbyae Niang

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have found carlos fierro better on occasions, i just loaned him out for a few season, to teams where he would get first team football (which ended up being hartlepool, reading and norwich) and he developed well.
 
They will both become good enough to a point where the difference is negligible. Go for the one who suits your team best.
 
both are absolute beast, but imo I would go for Niang,and carlos just next in line.

but carlos is much cheaper to buy than Niang
 
i have niang and carlos in my save squad, but they not in my planning for this season, never try they yet. niang scored a lot (behind yaya sonago) in my reverse top scoring for reserves league. but i think niang have a potential to be better than sonago as a poacher, great speed and finishing. Fierro will be good as a AF and IF (he's smart player). And my vote= definately Myabe-Niang.
 
They will both become good enough to a point where the difference is negligible. Go for the one who suits your team best.

What Joel said pretty much. I've had both of them developed to a world class level and guess what happens? They both score truck loads and honestly neither is really superior to the other.

But if I had to pick one I always choose Fierro, ever since hernandez joined United I love the Little mexican strikers!
 
Others have already said, I've got both and at 19, they're keeping up with each other stats wise. Can't loan Fierro out at the minute, he keeps getting work permit refused so I keep on having to give him game time myself. Just for the work permit issues, I'd choose Niang.
 
i have no doubt that Fierro is better. he is more clinical by far than Niang. and trust me, i've had both of them, on different saves at different clubs. and for some reason, some strikers always like to blast the ball when they are shooting at goal, and some players try to place the ball. niang is one who just blasts it and more often than not, misses. i had to sell him at age 24 because of the matches that he cost me. add to this the fact that Fierro is about 8 times cheaper than Niang, i would definitely DEFINITELY go for Carlos Fierro over Mbaye Niang. Every single time.
 
Carlos fierro!scored 40 goals in my 1st season,65 goals in my 2nd season!this guy is a beast!i didnt train him any ppm though!
 
Niang is a better poacher due physical stats, Fierro is more all-rounded. Both are great, question is, who fits your tactic better.
 
View attachment 231829
Carlos Fierro is simply amazing for me. I buy him on every save and after 3-4 seasons of loaning him out he always turns out into a monster. As the stats says 31 starts 32 goals and 15 assists is amazing. Also considering he comes in only for a compensation fee I find him a better buy when starting out with smaller teams.
View attachment 231830
He's got a decent record at Huddlesfield. Huddlesfield are actually challenging for the top 6 in my game so he's in a pretty good
team but considering he costs in the 5-7 million in the first 2 season I'd rather go for sanogo and fierro.

View attachment 231831
Fierro and Sanogo destroyed Barca in this match
 
I have both Niang & Fierro in my parma save and Niang has developed into the better player for me he has been brilliant and i am sure he is just going to keep getting better. I have signed Fierro in other saves and he has been quality but he has been unlucky with injuries in this save and i have loaned him out a couple of times to get some games but he hasn't really got going so i am going to give him another chance when he comes back from loan to see if i cin improve him.
 
I got Niang in 4th season for 4mil and 6 months later he was the worldsw best rated striker!
 
Fierro for me was fantastic, he scored something like 300 goals in 320 games and scored about 130 goals for mexico before he retired from internationals when he was 31.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top