Clusterquack FM16 - Control Narrow 433

I have found because the F9's automatically adjust tot he D-Line you don't need to switch up. It's on control so it should be holding onto control of the game. Parking the bus on fm just means lettign an opponent swarm you. Not a good idea on this ME as they will score.

Thanks

By the way I dunno why but I get better results on your 442, even instant resulting, creating more CCC too. Even got an astonishing 7-1 instant result against a team that has 1500 more rep than mine.
 
Thanks

By the way I dunno why but I get better results on your 442, even instant resulting, creating more CCC too. Even got an astonishing 7-1 instant result against a team that has 1500 more rep than mine.


Sod knows why dude. Alot of it may have to do with your *** Man's abilities. Or maybe the tactic is just sound. Folk forget that the manager reputation etc effects team talks effectiveness. So it may well be that a manager of lower exprience gets worse results.
 
That tactic is defensively a bag of ****. If you go a weaker team you get skullfucked.

Yea it is. Our defense gets cut open frequently with it. Had to ditch it. Clusterquack is solid defensively as far as I have played. Playing with Roma and we defeated Juventus in two games with the tactic just being competent. Waiting for the tactic to become fluid to see how far I can go:)
 
Sod knows why dude. Alot of it may have to do with your *** Man's abilities. Or maybe the tactic is just sound. Folk forget that the manager reputation etc effects team talks effectiveness. So it may well be that a manager of lower exprience gets worse results.

To be honest FM Touch Instant Results seems to be much better than on full FM. Tactics seems to work better specially 442, as I tested on previous patch, and I saw someone saying that attacking mentality works good on it too. I will try to keep using your 442 plus instant results on first division of Brazil now, after getting promoted. Using Assistant Manager for everything I can.
 
Do you think the tactic would still work without "get stuck in" selected? I'm racking up the cards.
 
Do you think the tactic would still work without "get stuck in" selected? I'm racking up the cards.


I tried it without and with only certain players doing it. Best thing to do if it's working you is take it off and edit all players to tackle hard. Then take that off if they get a booking manually.
 
That tactic is defensively a bag of ****. If you go a weaker team you get skullfucked.

Is why I mentioned combining the 2 in your 3 tactic slots, I haven't scored as many with the 3 F9s and it is easily better defensively mind you.
 
Used it in League 1 with good success (managing Oxford City, fourth season). Managed to get promoted even though it was a bit lucky (lots of draws and a few tight 1-0 wins at the end; total of 82 points after 46 games), but my squad is probably one of the worst in the division so it's definitely exceeded my expectations!

Was using Suk Sum Vanco's 4-3-3 in Conference and League 2, that stopped working in League 1 so switched to Christian Eriksen's Demolisher and then this tactic, which seemed to perform the best (CE's tactic probably had the nicest gameplay, but kept conceding the same stupid goals from crosses, maybe something to do with my **** defenders...)

Question for Chrissy Dude, since I'm now signing players for the Championship:

What are the attributes needed for the RPM roles? These are not in the list you linked to, and all the LLM players seem to have a red rating for the role...
 
Chrissy, why do you bother posting tactics here if you can't deal with all these questions?

You've been a member for a long time and you know how this sub-forum works. It's all about instructions what to do here, what to do there, and above all, it's about screenshots of results.

Yes, it's lame that some people want you to play the game for them. Yes, screenshots can be tampered with and results cheated. However, it is how it is.
 
Chrissy, why do you bother posting tactics here if you can't deal with all these questions?

You've been a member for a long time and you know how this sub-forum works. It's all about instructions what to do here, what to do there, and above all, it's about screenshots of results.

Yes, it's lame that some people want you to play the game for them. Yes, screenshots can be tampered with and results cheated. However, it is how it is.
And I wasn't even asking him for screenshots. Just some screens from the players, to have a look at 'how the tactic can perform', if they don't cheat.
 
Chrissy, why do you bother posting tactics here if you can't deal with all these questions?

You've been a member for a long time and you know how this sub-forum works. It's all about instructions what to do here, what to do there, and above all, it's about screenshots of results.

Yes, it's lame that some people want you to play the game for them. Yes, screenshots can be tampered with and results cheated. However, it is how it is.


I could post and fraudulently claim anything. If results are what you want to see and is the biggest swaying factor in you trying a tactic then you will most likely be in for some disappointment.

I have explained how the tactic works and how to use it. Everyone plays the game differently and therefore all the results will change and be different for each person.

I post the tactics because they are good. I post them because I think some people will want to use them. It's not that I can't deal with the questions, it's very much that I cannot be arsed. Years of posting on here only to have EVERYTHING argued about and folk chimping out because they win 10 but lose 1 has led me to a state of near bliss in not giving a single ****.

Try the tactics, if you have a question about how it works etc i'll 9 times out of ten reply. If it's for results then i'll start taking the **** from now on and get very creative in my screenshots.

Iv'e given instructions on how to use the tactic, how to apply it and what does what. I disagree with you about it being about results. It's a tactics sub forum for sharing tactics, not a forum for posting tactics and bullshitting about how well they work.

Peace and love to you dude.
 
Any results, not (just) @ Chrissy Dude?

And I wasn't even asking him for screenshots. Just some screens from the players, to have a look at 'how the tactic can perform', if they don't cheat.


You were asking for screenshots/results, now in the second quote you are now asking for players.

Just work on the assumption the tactic is completely broke, doesn't work and iv'e posted it for a laugh. It'll save you time worrying about it.

In answer to your question about 3 striker tactics. I have went with the false nines for one very special reason. They, I have found, unlike other roles, move and stretch the d-line when played together, creating pockets of space for each other, the DL, DR and MC's to move into. They come deep, move forward, hit channels. All very useful when trying to stretch an opposition in order to find space and gaps. They also tend to play the offside line well and close down well too. A solo F9 however seems almost lost at times and easily gets marked out a game. Three cause havoc the higher up the game and the better the players you get.
 
Back
Top