Do you start with a small or big team?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Patrick123
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 29
  • Views Views 6K

Do you prefer to start with a small or big team?

  • Small

    Votes: 15 34.1%
  • Big

    Votes: 10 22.7%
  • Both

    Votes: 19 43.2%

  • Total voters
    44
As small a possible for me :D

Started a save as Staines Town (Blue Square South, Local team), and have gained a promotion every season. Currently fighting for promotion in League 1 :)
 
Championship - League 1 mostly.

Never been a Big 4 team except Arsenal once for a challenge. :D
 
Usually do low LLM, but if I play in one of the top leagues I always pick the team with a media prediction of coming last and getting relegated.

Currently playing as St Paulli and its a different challenge - everyone trying to nick your wonderkids by trying to pay peanuts, apropriate level talent not wanting to sign for you, roster juggling, developing your kids. Having a wage and transfer budget is useless if no-one wants to come.

It's a lot different to do doing low leagues where finding talent and and juggling finances is your main concern
 
Mid table European sides.

Spurs
Dortmund
Toulouse
Aston Villa
Valencia
 
I choose a mix of teams but I always like smaller teams more, teams like Bristol Rovers, Chesterfield, Livingston
 
I like to start with a small team but the thing is by the time I build my way to Man Utd or Chelsea all sorts of players I dont recognise are there
 
I voted big it may seem biased but i always start with Rangers

I would say Rangers are big, but not easy . They can dominate the league but will struggle in Europe . Similar to Celtic, whom I start with .

I like starting with mid-table sides like Villarreal .
 
I like taking clubs from the bottom to the top because you feel like god if you achieve it, however, quick success with top clubs can always be fun, especially when in complete domination.
 
Back
Top