Dutch Football Association to examine Ake transfer

wrong wrong wrong, none of those players were poached

They got a suspended ban for A.cole dealings...?

They had to pay Utd 10million Compo for Mikel.

Mikel was 'forced' into signing for utd, he really wanted to go to chelsea and Chelsea paid utd 10 mil, so I don't get your point with Mikel!

Like Mike said all the top clubs do it because they want to beat off any competitors for the player's signature.

As for this case it's not Chelsea's fault at all! It's the player or agents fault (most likely the agent).

Mikel Signed a deal with utd.. Signed a Contract, then Chelsea got him to sign a deal when already under contract, hence why they paid Utd 10million, not a clean deal is it.
 
Mikel Signed a deal with utd.. Signed a Contract, then Chelsea got him to sign a deal when already under contract, hence why they paid Utd 10million, not a clean deal is it.

It's not Chelsea's fault he originally signed a contract, surely Mikel and his agent should be punished for that then for signing two contracts...
 
It's not Chelsea's fault he originally signed a contract, surely Mikel and his agent should be punished for that then for signing two contracts...

They where punished as well.. But To get a player to sign a contract with you, when he is under contract at another club, is against Fifa Rules,
 
Jon Obi Mikel has stated that he was pressured into signing for Man Utd while his advisors where not present. He asked Lyn for a week to think about the two offers one from Utd and one from Chelsea but they rejected this. If these claims by Mikel were true then Man Utd had acted in breach or Fifa and FA rules.

Now here is the main FACT, Man Utd made an official complaint to Fifa about Chelsea and the Mikels agent. The case was dismissed in August 2005 stating there was insufficent evidence to bring a case against Chelsea
 
Jon Obi Mikel has stated that he was pressured into signing for Man Utd while his advisors where not present. He asked Lyn for a week to think about the two offers one from Utd and one from Chelsea but they rejected this. If these claims by Mikel were true then Man Utd had acted in breach or Fifa and FA rules.

Now here is the main FACT, Man Utd made an official complaint to Fifa about Chelsea and the Mikels agent. The case was dismissed in August 2005 stating there was insufficent evidence to bring a case against Chelsea

The Important Fact you wanna miss out is Chelsea Paid United 10million English Pounds.. As what a charitable gift..? thought not as well.
 
The Important Fact you wanna miss out is Chelsea Paid United 10million English Pounds.. As what a charitable gift..? thought not as well.

Chelsea had to pay Utd money because Mikel was contracted to Man Utd lol.
 
So chelsea Broke fifa regulations.............. Thought So.
 
can we get back to this issue, not the past ones
 
So chelsea Broke fifa regulations.............. Thought So.

Chelse and Utd were not to blame. Man Utd signed Mikel but Mikel didnt want to sign for Utd, he was forced into signing for them. Like i say no charges were issued. Im not saying Chelsea are squeaky clean because its obvious we are not but on that occasion we were.
 
Chelse and Utd were not to blame. Man Utd signed Mikel but Mikel didnt want to sign for Utd, he was forced into signing for them. Like i say no charges were issued. Im not saying Chelsea are squeaky clean because its obvious we are not but on that occasion we were.

You still broke a fifa regulation... You got a player to sign a contract with you, when his name was on another clubs contract for a 4 year deal.. that is against the rules, woteva way you look at it.
 
Top