duties...who scores in which setup

[Igneos79]

So, If you want, you can simply take a great team in the world first, pick one of the formations that game offers second, pick fluid team shape third, and then change mentalities.

This is what I did. Just to see the effect of each mentality.

I played each formation and mentality 3 times (reloaded) and the below is average. Tactic fluidity: ackward.

Results:



442 control: both strikers same amount of goals
442 attack: support duty striker hattricks
442 counter: attack duty striker hattricks
442 defend: attack duty striker single goal

4231 wide control: wingers same amount of goals
4231 wide attack: wingers many goals
4231 wide counter: attack duty striker hattricks
4231 wide defend: no goals, match lost

532 wb control: both strikers same amount of goals
532 wb attack: support duty striker two goals
532 wb counter: attack duty striker two goals
532 wb defend: attack duty striker single goal

433 control: all three strikers score
433 attack: support duty striker hattricks
433 counter: both attack duty strikers score 2 goals each
433 defend: both attack duty striker 1 goal each

Hope this helps someone. cheers!

 

[WJ]

That's a small sample size. It's also extremely simplistic to conclude which duty scores the most, because there are so many variables - non of which you've taken into account.

Your "test" is a start, but very basic and wholly flawed so far.

 

[dilakh2]

That's a small sample size. It's also extremely simplistic to conclude which duty scores the most, because there are so many variables - non of which you've taken into account.

Your "test" is a start, but very basic and wholly flawed so far.

they should just call you mr knows everything there is to know about tactics.

 

[WJ]

they should just call you mr knows everything there is to know about tactics.

Very far from it.

Like I said though, it's a start and that's good, but it's not anywhere near complete. Much work is still ahead to conclude anything.

 

[dilakh2]

Very far from it.

Like I said though, it's a start and that's good, but it's not anywhere near complete. Much work is still ahead to conclude anything.

imma have to start asking you help on my own tactic, i score a lot each game but i always let in basically like liverpool last season. thats if you want to help.

 

[dilakh2]

its essentially a high pressure system, i win the ball as quickly as i can. then the whole team bar the centre halfs push up. i get about 5 or 6 in the box and 2 lurking outside with the fulbacks supporting. scores many and i dominate. but i feel if i didnt have good centrehalves then any ball over the top especially when i play against fast strikers i get caught out.

i play two versions of this system. i usually listen to my assman who if he says they are vunerable 4 2 3 1 formation. if not the other version. the wingers effectively act as inside forward on some occasions or an extra striker, because they can focus on getting in behind or coming inside when they like.

anywayy thank you for the help, if you help.

 

[WJ]

imma have to start asking you help on my own tactic, i score a lot each game but i always let in basically like liverpool last season. thats if you want to help.

Start your own thread. It's not fair on Igneos to hijack this one.

 

[dilakh2]

Start your own thread. It's not fair on Igneos to hijack this one.

oh sorry my bad.

 

[callamity]

That's a small sample size. It's also extremely simplistic to conclude which duty scores the most, because there are so many variables - non of which you've taken into account.

Your "test" is a start, but very basic and wholly flawed so far.

I agree here.

This has potential I think to help people who struggle creating tactics to see where goals will come from. This is one of the main questions to ask when creating a tactic. Who will score, who will supply, how will they accomplish this etc

 

[callamity]

they should just call you mr knows everything there is to know about tactics.

Very far from it.

Like I said though, it's a start and that's good, but it's not anywhere near complete. Much work is still ahead to conclude anything.

To be fair, you give out solid advice and always try to help people learn for themselves. Might not know everything but definitely one of the best sources of help, info in this part of the forum.