I just bought my very first FM game. Entertaining and addictive already. But frustrating at the same time.
I have already spent some 20 minutes reading up on the awful finishing in FM on various forums/sites to see whether its just me or the game. Same with various attributes, how they act, the PPMs, player morale, shot angles, team talks etc.
For example, I will take my last game (Chelsea vs Liverpool).
[/URL]
Uploaded with ImageShack.us[/IMG]
The statistics say opposite of the score. We obviously dominated possession and had much superior chances to score, as shown in the CCC stat. I would like to avoid the talk of "what is actually classified as a CCC IRL". The clear cut chances when viewed are simply astounding sitters. The striker is completely one on one with the keeper and has no other players around him. I'd expect a "world class" striker to finish at least 1 of those even at his worst form.
But no - it was never to be as Reina typically blocked all those shots. Or rather - my striker put them straight at him. This of course resulting in a MOTM award and a rating of 8.8.
[IMG
Uploaded with ImageShack.us[/IMG]
So I say, fair enough lad. Those were fantastic saves. I have seen some unbeatable keepers in my time. What I don't agree with, is this happening every 2 matches. I rarely see such performances in real life, the one in Schalke vs United (Neuer) is the closest I can think of in some 20+ games. And again, it would be acceptable when they are the two best keepers involved, but it happens to EVERY single keeper from Gomes to Almunia.
Of course to add further to pain, this guy scored twice from 30+ yards.
[/URL]
Uploaded with ImageShack.us[/IMG]
Meanwhile my striker in typical hilarious fashion decides that he wants the commentator to say "Oh, that was a sitter!" or "How did he miss that?" or "He missed when it was easier to score!" or "Should have done much better with that chance!" and etc, but I'm sure you get the point.
[/URL]
Uploaded with ImageShack.us[/IMG]
This brings up my opinion on FM. There are FAR too many CCC/scoring chances/sitters created in FM. Its not the strikers finishing (well it is) but actually the amount of those chances being converted. I'm somewhat confident that FM prevents this so huge scorelines don't happen.
And again, I agree with this match, that keepers are unbeatable on one day, that poor strikers have amazing days, that even the worlds best don't score, that chances are gone waisting all the time. And again, what I DON'T agree with, is the frequency with which it happens.
What are your honest opinions on this, and is FM really entertaining when you have to put up with such a headache?
I have already spent some 20 minutes reading up on the awful finishing in FM on various forums/sites to see whether its just me or the game. Same with various attributes, how they act, the PPMs, player morale, shot angles, team talks etc.
For example, I will take my last game (Chelsea vs Liverpool).
Uploaded with ImageShack.us[/IMG]
The statistics say opposite of the score. We obviously dominated possession and had much superior chances to score, as shown in the CCC stat. I would like to avoid the talk of "what is actually classified as a CCC IRL". The clear cut chances when viewed are simply astounding sitters. The striker is completely one on one with the keeper and has no other players around him. I'd expect a "world class" striker to finish at least 1 of those even at his worst form.
But no - it was never to be as Reina typically blocked all those shots. Or rather - my striker put them straight at him. This of course resulting in a MOTM award and a rating of 8.8.
[IMG
Uploaded with ImageShack.us[/IMG]
So I say, fair enough lad. Those were fantastic saves. I have seen some unbeatable keepers in my time. What I don't agree with, is this happening every 2 matches. I rarely see such performances in real life, the one in Schalke vs United (Neuer) is the closest I can think of in some 20+ games. And again, it would be acceptable when they are the two best keepers involved, but it happens to EVERY single keeper from Gomes to Almunia.
Of course to add further to pain, this guy scored twice from 30+ yards.
Uploaded with ImageShack.us[/IMG]
Meanwhile my striker in typical hilarious fashion decides that he wants the commentator to say "Oh, that was a sitter!" or "How did he miss that?" or "He missed when it was easier to score!" or "Should have done much better with that chance!" and etc, but I'm sure you get the point.
Uploaded with ImageShack.us[/IMG]
This brings up my opinion on FM. There are FAR too many CCC/scoring chances/sitters created in FM. Its not the strikers finishing (well it is) but actually the amount of those chances being converted. I'm somewhat confident that FM prevents this so huge scorelines don't happen.
And again, I agree with this match, that keepers are unbeatable on one day, that poor strikers have amazing days, that even the worlds best don't score, that chances are gone waisting all the time. And again, what I DON'T agree with, is the frequency with which it happens.
What are your honest opinions on this, and is FM really entertaining when you have to put up with such a headache?
Last edited: