this. clubs and countries have bee crying out for this for years. the technology is there. to say this is bad news is ridiculousHow exactly is it BAD news? I think it is about ****** time.
bad news are you serious?Apparently will be there for the next World Cup, 2014.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/world_cup_2010/8801981.stm
Bad news, if this is true
not necessairly. just because you have it for one, doesnt mean to you must have it for the rest. first things first, lets the big obvious problems rightMy only problem with goal line technology is that once they use it for the goal line people will want it used for offsides, corners, fouls and the game won't flow.
not when it the consequences can be so massive. as for slwoing the game down. 10 seconds. tahts how long it took to prove lampards shot was acorss the line. one 7 second replay. thats how long it took for argentinas goal to be proved wrong on the big screenI just like the human error part of football, it gives controversary, and maybe it's not nice for the team on rhe negative end of it, but it gives conversation and shiz and changing the rules of the game. Will it be like in Tennis were they get so many 'check the video' moments? The game will be stopped to go to the video ref and all, progression isn't always good, wether it's inevitable or not Imho
I agree that they need to get these decisions right I just don't want it to be taken too far and ruin the game.not necessairly. just because you have it for one, doesnt mean to you must have it for the rest. first things first, lets the big obvious problems right
i personly dont want goalline technology, football is a game full ov debate and opionions so i say lets leave it the way it is.
They've got to look at it a lot, to check it's gone over, and make sure of it, otherwise there will be more controversay than ever
not i doesnt take that long. we saw how quickly it can be done when they got the decisions wrong vs germany and argentina mexico. the ball technology , if you need to take that step, is already done.They've got to look at it a lot, to check it's gone over, and make sure of it, otherwise there will be more controversay than ever
there will always be debate, but things like what happened dont need to be debated, they were just wrongi personly dont want goalline technology, football is a game full ov debate and opionions so i say lets leave it the way it is.
How far down does this system go? Does it get into the Conference? If a team gets promoted to a 'dodgy decision' where they don't have this chip, then the team beaten won't be happy.Not really, they dont even need to use video replays. For goal line technology they can use a chip in the ball. Which has been developed already so that the ball is exactly the same wait and that way they will know straight away.
Its good to have errors in football as it sparks debate and makes it more exciting.
How far down does this system go? Does it get into the Conference? If a team gets promoted to a 'dodgy decision' where they don't have this chip, then the team beaten won't be happy.
this.I doubt it is too expensive, but you cant say that the quality of football and the officials are as good in the Blue Square Premier as they are in the Prem anyway. Which is one arguement FIFA have used is that they want football to be the same in a park as it is at Old Trafford. It isnt anyway, and games at Old Trafford etc. are more important for a lot of reasons.