GYR - HULK 4312 FM26 Tactic 2026-03-06

[GYRFM]

GYRFM uploaded GYR - HULK 4312 FM26 Tactic

Leave feedback below.

 

[McFly92]

@max737 where are you mate?

 

[alain22]

@max737 where are you mate?

 

[lambymi17]

@max737 where are you mate?

He's just moving some recruitment budgets around to get Haaland, Vini Jnr and Vitinha...

 

[max737]

One of the strongest tactics tested on the 26.2.0, I won a quadruple with Arsenal first season. I topped the CL league phase with 7 wins and 1 draw. I won 10-2 against Wolves, 6-1 against Liverpool, 8-0 against Chelsea, 5-1 against Bayern, 4-2 away at Liverpool, 4-0 against Spurs, and very comfortably beat RM in the CL finals 5-1. Gyokeres was the top scorer with 49 goals and Rice with 29 assists. I scored 133 goals in the league and kept 22 clean sheets overall. I scored 25 corner goals. Amazing tactic by GYR !!!

 

[CheeseChaser26]

One of the strongest tactics tested on the 26.2.0, I won a quadruple with Arsenal first season. I topped the CL league phase with 7 wins and 1 draw. I won 10-2 against Wolves, 6-1 against Liverpool, 8-0 against Chelsea, 5-1 against Bayern, 4-2 away at Liverpool, 4-0 against Spurs, and very comfortably beat RM in the CL finals 5-1. Gyokeres was the top scorer with 49 goals and Rice with 29 assists. I scored 133 goals in the league and kept 22 clean sheets overall. I scored 25 corner goals. Amazing tactic by GYR !!!

Mate give it a rest will you, testing with Haaland and Mbappe up front is not testing..... you look stupid

 

[filippe!!]

Una delle tattiche più efficaci testate sul 26.2.0: ho vinto il quadruplo con l'Arsenal nella mia prima stagione. Ho dominato la fase a gironi di Champions League con 7 vittorie e 1 pareggio. Ho vinto 10-2 contro i Wolves, 6-1 contro il Liverpool, 8-0 contro il Chelsea, 5-1 contro il Bayern, 4-2 in trasferta a Liverpool, 4-0 contro gli Spurs e ho battuto agevolmente l'Arsenal nella finale di Champions League per 5-1. Gyokeres è stato il capocannoniere con 49 gol e Rice con 29 assist. Ho segnato 133 gol in campionato e mantenuto la porta inviolata in 22 partite complessive. Ho segnato 25 gol su calcio d'angolo. Una tattica incredibile quella di GYR !!!

vincere facile

 

[DeliciousStory]

Going to post results about that for next claim vs reality episode

 

[GYRFM]

Going to post results about that for next claim vs reality episode

fmdna already had this covered

 

[DeliciousStory]

fmdna already had this covered

We gonna see how those data diverge from mine then

This arsenal x 5

edited, didn't upload all 5

can compare data here :

Claim Vs Reality Database

docs.google.com

 

[DeliciousStory]

Leeds x 5

 

[GYRFM]

Leeds x 5

is the team locked in to use current selection where possible or however its worded?

 

[DeliciousStory]

is the team locked in to use current selection where possible or however its worded?

Everything is explained in the "index" Tab of the google sheet.

Claim Vs Reality Database

docs.google.com

 

[DeliciousStory]

Super League's runs :

If you do one run only, or pick the best outcome, all you are really showing is that a tactic can look great when the run goes your way. If RNG goes against it, the level can drop a lot.

As you saw, this tactic had some very strong runs and some poor ones. That is exactly why I use min/max analysis. It is not complicated, it just takes more time.

I am not saying it is a bad tactic. I am saying that calling it unstoppable is not supported by the data, and that is the whole point of this project.

 

[Driniemralfc]

Super League's runs :

If you do one run only, or pick the best outcome, all you are really showing is that a tactic can look great when the run goes your way. If RNG goes against it, the level can drop a lot.

As you saw, this tactic had some very strong runs and some poor ones. That is exactly why I use min/max analysis. It is not complicated, it just takes more time.

I am not saying it is a bad tactic. I am saying that calling it unstoppable is not supported by the data, and that is the whole point of this project.

Tell us then which tactic in fm26 is op till now

 

[DeliciousStory]

Tell us then which tactic in fm26 is op till now

There is no serious answer to that without context.

If you ask what I personally prefer, I usually go for control-possession tactics.

 

[GYRFM]

Super League's runs :

If you do one run only, or pick the best outcome, all you are really showing is that a tactic can look great when the run goes your way. If RNG goes against it, the level can drop a lot.

As you saw, this tactic had some very strong runs and some poor ones. That is exactly why I use min/max analysis. It is not complicated, it just takes more time.

I am not saying it is a bad tactic. I am saying that calling it unstoppable is not supported by the data, and that is the whole point of this project.

Ok mate. Like it said before right now I feel a bit like your trying to get views off my tactics and posts as you could post all this on your channel/socials and the people who want to watch it can. I have used the word unstoppable showed my results and as I said before I show the saves, the match engine and no editor owed. I haven't said 100% WIN RATE 400 GOALS A SEASON which I see around plenty and would be massively misleading .

Which is more misleading a word broken or unstoppable or jumping on tactic posts adding all your socials including a link to a video you did like you are doing it to help and not just guide people to check your stuff out

I show my tests are genuine and I only run them once after the tactic passes my initial testing phase of play and holiday. I put alot of time into each one which is why there is only 1 or 2 a week.

Anyway good luck with the content

 

[DeliciousStory]

Ok mate. Like it said before right now I feel a bit like your trying to get views off my tactics and posts as you could post all this on your channel/socials and the people who want to watch it can. I have used the word unstoppable showed my results and as I said before I show the saves, the match engine and no editor owed. I haven't said 100% WIN RATE 400 GOALS A SEASON which I see around plenty and would be massively misleading .

Which is more misleading a word broken or unstoppable or jumping on tactic posts adding all your socials including a link to a video you did like you are doing it to help and not just guide people to check your stuff out

I show my tests are genuine and I only run them once after the tactic passes my initial testing phase of play and holiday. I put alot of time into each one which is why there is only 1 or 2 a week.

Anyway good luck with the content

You keep changing the subject.

First it was “awkward”, then “advert”, now “views”. None of that changes the actual point.

You used a strong public label like unstoppable. I tested whether the data supported it across broader environments. That is fair.

Showing a genuine save proves the run happened. It does not prove the label is accurate overall. And if one or two runs are enough for you to support a claim, I do not see why broader testing suddenly becomes an issue.

Especially when, if you had actually watched the video properly, you would have seen I said the tactic looked very strong with Arsenal.

So again, this was never personal. The point is simple: if you use stronger labels, expect stronger scrutiny.

And by the way, if I wanted views from FMBase, I would have gone after Vujevic, not you. Let’s keep it real.

 

[GYRFM]

You keep changing the subject.

First it was “awkward”, then “advert”, now “views”. None of that changes the actual point.

You used a strong public label like unstoppable. I tested whether the data supported it across broader environments. That is fair.

Showing a genuine save proves the run happened. It does not prove the label is accurate overall. And if one or two runs are enough for you to support a claim, I do not see why broader testing suddenly becomes an issue.

Especially when, if you had actually watched the video properly, you would have seen I said the tactic looked very strong with Arsenal.

So again, this was never personal. The point is simple: if you use stronger labels, expect stronger scrutiny.

And by the way, if I wanted views from FMBase, I would have gone after Vujevic, not you. Let’s keep it real.

I have not checked his views out and don't really know who that is so couldn't "keep it real" I will likely have seen his stuff but don't remember it same as I recognise your name from last year but can't tell you what tactic.

I don't consider them stronger titles as I said there is no extreme claim on it.

No one or two runs are not enough, I said I spend alot of time on them and have a testing system before I do the release tests.

Views and advert are the same aim, awkward as there is a conflict of interest given you used to do your own tactics and I don't know if you still do. All reasonable comments.

I didn't watch the video but as I said good luck with it. Let's keep it positive

 

[DeliciousStory]

I have not checked his views out and don't really know who that is so couldn't "keep it real" I will likely have seen his stuff but don't remember it same as I recognise your name from last year but can't tell you what tactic.

I don't consider them stronger titles as I said there is no extreme claim on it.

No one or two runs are not enough, I said I spend alot of time on them and have a testing system before I do the release tests.

Views and advert are the same aim, awkward as there is a conflict of interest given you used to do your own tactics and I don't know if you still do. All reasonable comments.

I didn't watch the video but as I said good luck with it. Let's keep it positive

Even if you do not see those as strong titles, I do, and that is my personal judgement.

So I do not really buy the conflict of interest point. You use labels like meta, broken or unstoppable, but somehow others are not allowed to check whether those labels actually hold up because you think they are chasing views?

If I wanted your viewers, I would have gone straight to FMScout, not FMBase.

Here is a quick Paint screenshot to make the data as clear as possible.

My point was simply to test whether the label was supported by the data. If you do not like what the data shows, that does not change it.