GYRFM
Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2021
- Messages
- 146
- Reaction score
- 31
- Points
- 28
You have used your test method to gain an opinion fair enough mate I am happy that what I am showing people is accurate and I show more about the game status and other sides than most.Even if you do not see those as strong titles, I do, and that is my personal judgement.
So I do not really buy the conflict of interest point. You use labels like meta, broken or unstoppable, but somehow others are not allowed to check whether those labels actually hold up because you think they are chasing views?
If I wanted your viewers, I would have gone straight to FMScout, not FMBase.
Here is a quick Paint screenshot to make the data as clear as possible.
My point was simply to test whether the label was supported by the data. If you do not like what the data shows, that does not change it.
Thats fine if you don't get it.
I don't need a paint screenshot I am not that bothered about the view numbers on here or I would already know this.
I haven't seen the data to not like it. Hope you are doing well mate this has turned into a much longer conversation than it's worth as you have your opinion that your tests are solid proof of stuff and I think its content.
As I said I am trying to keep it positive, happy to leave it there and wish you the best with your content.
I remember one of your tactics I heard was really good last year be great to see what you do this year at some point and hope people enjoy it.
Have a great day mate didn't mean to upset you just my views on it as I find it a negative form of content you trying to discredit other people stuff even if they show the details behind it because of your specific testing method but each to their own!