GYRFM
Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2021
- Messages
- 144
- Reaction score
- 30
- Points
- 28
Why ur comments are the same in every tactic Gyr is posting?Tested on the 26.1.3, I went invincible with Arsenal first season and also won a quadruple. Saka scored 40 goals and 38 assists and an average rating of 8.12. Eze scored 39 goals and 26 assists. I scored 143 goals in the league and 108 points. I had 28 clean sheets and scored 31 corner goals. I won all the league games 8/8 in Champions League group phase. I beat Chelsea 8-0, Fulham and Burnley away 0-7, Liverpool 5-0, I was unbeaten for 40 games in all competitions. Best tactic on FM 26!!!![]()
Fake account?Why ur comments are the same in every tactic Gyr is posting?
Hey hope you are well. Gave the video a skim saw Arsenal did well, couple champs league finishes for leeds, couple top half. Not a clue what the league you have built includes but did see it was with 2 teams in the same test.Found this tactic on FMScout.
The results were very good with Arsenal, but less convincing with Leeds.
It collapsed in a controlled test environment.
Overall, it feels like after the update, everything is more RNG-driven and harder with underdog teams.
For more data:
I havent tested with them so not sure what you meanbonjour
moi je comprends pas pourquoi la première année il y a autant de stars dans l'équipe
vini halland mbappe ..... mdr normal que tu gagnes.
Also posts the same on his [own] Patreon lolbros deffo taking the **** lmao they dont just sound similar, its literally the same post on every GYR tactic, might not be a fake account but lmao
you say own you think I am posting on my own patreon to promote the tactic?Also posts the same on his [own] Patreon lol
Hey hope you are well. Gave the video a skim saw Arsenal did well, couple champs league finishes for leeds, couple top half. Not a clue what the league you have built includes but did see it was with 2 teams in the same test.
Always find it a little awkward when people who make tactics test others esp as we haven't spoken (fmdna and others reached out before doing it)
Hope your doing well, not seen if you have done tactics this year but hopefully your enjoying the game and I guess there is enough links and a video above if people want to go check your stuff out.
No issue with them being tested which is why I have told holdmyheim and fmdna to go for it just comes across as more of an advert for your content but all good you do your thing!Hey, all good.
Claim vs Reality is there to give people better insight when a tactic is pushed with big claims.
Arsenal is one 5-run simulation, just like Leeds. The FMBase-based (super league) test league is simply another environment, updated to make it more logical.
So, is it broken? Clearly no. It performed well in one specific environment, Arsenal, but that does not support the “broken” label.
I don’t think there is any need to discuss anything privately beforehand. It’s not personal, it’s about the claims, and I think it’s completely fair to check them![]()
No issue with them being tested which is why I have told holdmyheim and fmdna to go for it just comes across as more of an advert for your content but all good you do your thing!
Also anywhere I can check the alternative test league out myself?
Absolutely I usually include my game status and saves and sometimes squads. Dont even own the editor just like people to know what they are gettingI test claims, not people. If the data does not back the label, the label is wrong.
Regarding the source, it comes from the old FMBase test league. I just reworked it to make it more logical and less painfully slow to run.
Since you are posting here, I assumed that setup was considered credible by people on FMBase at the time.
Absolutely I usually include my game status and saves and sometimes squads. Dont even own the editor just like people to know what they are getting
so is there nowhere to use the testing league you are using?