I always thought that:
Example: You have £10million left transfer budget. But you want a player who is valued at £20million. I thought you could pay the £10million you've got, then pay the rest over 12months or whatever.
I know once you pay your £10million you wont have anything to pay monthly. But then why does it take all your money if you do it the other way.
Example: You buy a player for £10million but decide to pay it over 12 months. So no up front payment. Because you're spreading it over a year.
Is there any benefits to this?
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
Example: You have £10million left transfer budget. But you want a player who is valued at £20million. I thought you could pay the £10million you've got, then pay the rest over 12months or whatever.
I know once you pay your £10million you wont have anything to pay monthly. But then why does it take all your money if you do it the other way.
Example: You buy a player for £10million but decide to pay it over 12 months. So no up front payment. Because you're spreading it over a year.
Is there any benefits to this?
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks,