Jake Livermore

P

philipalfred

Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Does this guy turn out to anything good? He looks promising in my Tottenham save and I wonder if i should keep him or buy a more talented midfielder like Sissoko?
 
Jake

Hey, I wondered exactly the same thing to be honest. Although I took the gamble and sold him on after loaning him to Newcastle for the rest of the first season.

Here's a screenshot of him at the start of the 4th season. His passing is his best quality but he hasn't improved all that much overall.

Good player for a middle-low premiership club. Overall, not good enough for the spurs squad!
 
Disclaimer101 said:
Hey, I wondered exactly the same thing to be honest. Although I took the gamble and sold him on after loaning him to Newcastle for the rest of the first season.

Here's a screenshot of him at the start of the 4th season. His passing is his best quality but he hasn't improved all that much overall.

Good player for a middle-low premiership club. Overall, not good enough for the spurs squad!
Click to expand...

Thanks for the screenshot! Well, i've played him as a box-to-box midfielder as a substitution in the first 5 PL games, he scored 1 goal and 1 assist. If he plays well I will definitly keep him :) Of course Scott Parker will be the first choice, and Huddlestone the second, but for his age he plays very mature.
 
I was hoping Jake would be a bit better than he is tbh, same with Tom Carroll.

Don't know why you're playing Scotty ahead of Hudd mate, Hudd is a star better! (at least he is on mine!)
 
jon02 said:
I was hoping Jake would be a bit better than he is tbh, same with Tom Carroll.

Don't know why you're playing Scotty ahead of Hudd mate, Hudd is a star better! (at least he is on mine!)
Click to expand...

Don't always trust the scout reports.

On my Liverpool save I have Sterling and Lavezzi on the right wing, but I play Sterling, even though he only has a 2 star CA. Why? Because he performs like a god !

Which means, if Parker performs better than Huddlestone, Parker should be the definite first choice.
 
jon02 said:
I was hoping Jake would be a bit better than he is tbh, same with Tom Carroll.

Don't know why you're playing Scotty ahead of Hudd mate, Hudd is a star better! (at least he is on mine!)
Click to expand...

Well, I think that Scott is a bit faster than Tom, and that's probably one of the biggest reasons i play him. Tom got some great passing skills, but for his size i think he should be alot better at tackles and things like that. Well, we all have our different thoughts :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top