Lamela or Isco

[kop4life]

Hi everyone! I'm Liverpool and I'm halfway through the 2013 Jan. window. I can either buy Isco for about £17.5 million or Lamela for about £19 million. Right now, I play a 4-3-3 and a 4-1-4-1. I really need reinforcements as Suarez is out for the next two months. I also bought Wellington Nem this window. Who should I get?

 

[JonoMUFC]

I would definitely get Isco, I prefer him to Lamela, although Im unsure of his progression in the game

 

[mental man]

Isco for me as well, both are favorites of mine but Isco is just unreal. one of the best players in the game this year. Lamela has a bit more pace about him but Isco's attacking attributes... wonderful.

 

[Scotty98TR]

As I said in the deal or no deal thread, Lamela starts off better, but Isco has much better potential and becomes better than Lemala quickly.

 

[hersi 7]

Lamela is fysically better, but Isco is technically on top of the world. Are you pressing alot? In that case I'd take Isco. But if you're playing counter-football, I think Lamela will fit better.
On what position do you want them to play? AML, AMR or AMC?

 

[craig curtis]

Isco -AMC
Lamela-AML.......................SIMPLES

 

[TheUltTekkers]

I would go for Isco was amazing for me in amc!

 

[TommyTomster]

apparently Lamela is the closest thing you get too messi in 13!

 

[TommyTomster]

http://footballmanagerstory.com/scout/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/lamela-future.png