Luke Shaw or Alex Sandro ?

[eupheus]

I generally tend to develop the club I'm at, rather than try to make quick profits. I've had tons of offers from clubs for Shaw, Ward-Prowse, Wanyama, Schneiderlin and the like. Turned them down each time. I managed to make Soton the biggest club, overtaking Barca in that list.

Oh well I actually misunderstood thinking your save was with PSG.

I've gone with Shaw but I'm still curious about which would be the better option.

 

[dkerden]

Give Alex Telles a try, cheap and a good player. Also young

 

[antamiki]

Alex Sandro- Beast & consistent

 

[xtempad]

Luke Shaw, all day long..... Solid from 1st season of signing him

 

[Gillanx23x]

Jonathan Silva is better than shaw, but will take same amount of time to progress. But depending on which league your in, Luke shaw might be the better option

 

[Zadix]

I wil say that they are equally good players when developed. However Sandro is 4-5 years older and as a result far more developed. He is a star at the start of the game whereas Shaw takes a couple of seasons to get there. Add Shaws price tag which is at least 3 times bigger in my experience and Alex Sandro is the better option unless you are a rich club with an established LB in the squad. In that case it makes sense to go with the high upside development guy.

Right now I'm playing a save with Liverpool and I'm most certainly going to buy Sandro over Shaw.

 

[vjcsmoke]

I went with Ben Davies because they wanted way too much for Shaw. You have to be patient when signing young players. Fortunately Davies is turning into quite the playmaker and his 'backup' is Clyne. So I have plenty of talent in the pipeline. I hear Shaw is 'unsettled' near the end of season 2 though so I might try to steal him on the 'cheap'! LOL