mufc - falcao or van persie?

[amarsh95]

in a dilemma with who to play. Started the season with falcao and hes got 6 goals in 4 games in the EPL. Feel like van persie may offer alot more and having spoken to some people van persie seems to be hitting over 30 and 40+ goals in there saves.

 

[boyschewlego]

4-4-2. Play both?

 

[DoubleR]

I have also seen van Persie score a lot of goals... but he is getting older.. I have also seen people just getting rid of him and trying Falcao

 

[FM2K15]

Falcao for Me is Quality.I got rid of RVP after 1st season in a Straight swap for Lamela and he was quality for me 2nd season.Just sold Lamela to Barcelona for 45m. But heres a SS of Falcao in my 3rd season now.View attachment 331577

 

[amarsh95]

would play two up top but cant get a tactic right that way yet. been playing basically a 4-3-3 wih falcao up top by himself. results are a bit hit and miss and cant get any real consistency yet. falcao is clinical though.

 

[GMI]

They're quite different types of players. Falcao is the main striker with amazing finishing abilities both with feet and head, while van Persie is better as a second striker. While van Persie also can play as a lone striker, he can perform the best as a traquiresta with a striker partner or inside forwards from wings.

So if you'll use more supporting wingers with good crossing abilities, then Falcao will be a better choice as an advanced forward or target man. But if you want your wingers to have more attacking roles, then use van Persie as a traquiresta.

My choice is to use them both as van Persie's great passing and crossing abilities can feed Falcao greatly.

 

[Tobey Mason]

Falcao is good for me. Can Persie is so-so. Rooney is doing well as a MC for me tho