i have to agree with most of the celtic fans who say he is **** and overrated, because they are actually correct.
he's as bad as lafferty. actually, i'm not sure which of them is worse. i would be absolutely gutted if he came back. just cos he plays for the jersey doesn't make him a great player, and that's what half the fans don't realise.
i watch the whole game, not just where the ball is, so i pick up on more of what's happening, something you won't see watching on tv. this is half the reason why i believe lafferty is ****. i see what he does or doesn't do, off the ball. the other half of the reason is that he really isn't a striker. saturday's game against hearts he was continually caught offside. any decent striker would know to watch the line. then he moans about it, and stamps his feet. really mature. this guy is more interested in the footballer's lifestyle than the game. ask him what kind of car he drives... something most of us can only dream about owning.
is that what rangers are reduced to, though?? taking back the rubbish that left? they want more money so they leave, don't make it at their new team, and come crawling back. it's about time Rangers stood up and said, no, you left, stay gone.
he'll be 32 in march, for whoever said he was a bit old now.
if he comes back, it is a step backwards, and really it's saying that the strikers we already have aren't capable of playing for the team. how many are there?? lafferty (haha), naismith, jelavic, beattie, fleck, little, and the other younger players, loy and hutton, although hutton is being used as a midfielder. give these guys a chance instead of bringing in a has been.
oh and if you hadn't guessed, i'm a rangers fan, and have been all my life.