Can you imagine the number of games each team will be playing?
yer i know, there should be a league competition for the teams that finish in the top 2 of Top European leagues and then keep the champions league for teams that finish 3rd and 4th etc.
Can you imagine the number of games each team will be playing?
yer i know, there should be a league competition for the teams that finish in the top 2 of Top European leagues and then keep the champions league for teams that finish 3rd and 4th etc.
I'm really glad that you dont know Platini personally. When you say European competition every european nation should get fair chance, With UCL we have qualifiers, how can you discard say Ajax saying they dont play in top league when the fact is Chelsea is no where near what Ajax is/was.
im just saying i would like to see a actual champions league thats all. i know it wouldnt happen because it wouldnt be fair.
Actual Champions league means? Only Champions of leagues playing? That was not at all a good idea. Real and Barca are two big clubs but only one can compete whereas teams from small nations will be playing every year. I would say this format is the best one.
A few chelsea key players, such as Lamps, terry, drogba. are the wrong side of 30 (although correct me if I am wrong there) and I think they may struggle with tiredness and injuries to key players in the later part of the season, which may hold them back in the league and Europe. Although I may be proved wrong
A few chelsea key players, such as Lamps, terry, drogba. are the wrong side of 30 (although correct me if I am wrong there) and I think they may struggle with tiredness and injuries to key players in the later part of the season, which may hold them back in the league and Europe. Although I may be proved wrong
this has been said for the last few years and i still aint convinced by it
this has been said for the last few years and i still aint convinced by it
People say Terry is 30 when is 30, how can they say few years ago that Terry is 30 <)
they said he was approaching 30 and tbh many people say bout chelsea have a few players wrong side of 30 but what about utd ?? scholes giggs ferdinand neville berbatov van der sar brown are all 30 or over and hargreaves evra carrick sung vidic o'shea are all approaching 30
What has United team age got to do with my post.? Why are you even bringing that?
because everyone goes on about chelsea having an aging squad which could be a disadvantage when competing with utd for trophies when alot of their players age ranges are about the same as chelseas
If anything all i can hear is we are on decline, Chelsea are this that bla bla bla.
Tbh you had aging squad and offloaded lot of high earning dead woods. Now your squad is so thin, would like to see how you cope up during mid season and business end.
The age/size of chelsea's squad surely will play a big part in whether they can win the champions league, won't it?Stay on topic
not really imo. but they're just getting into another argument rather actually debating it, especially when chelsea's isnt that old. its not even about age, its about fitness, and chelsea's fitness is supremely highly, imo only united have a fitter squadThe age/size of chelsea's squad surely will play a big part in whether they can win the champions league, won't it?
Stay on topic