Seaman for England Number 1!
What? Did you even watch the second half? oO)
Yes, and what? Seaman was impressive in the first half when he played and when Theakston played he made a few good saves but made an equal amount of dreadful blunders. Plus with Seaman in goal we would have won on penalties AND Seaman didn't concede whereas Theakston let in 2.
Yes, and what? Seaman was impressive in the first half when he played and when Theakston played he made a few good saves but made an equal amount of dreadful blunders. Plus with Seaman in goal we would have won on penalties AND Seaman didn't concede whereas Theakston let in 2.
yes but theakston has played 3 times in 4 years and seaman was a world class goalie :S
Yes, and what? Seaman was impressive in the first half when he played and when Theakston played he made a few good saves but made an equal amount of dreadful blunders. Plus with Seaman in goal we would have won on penalties AND Seaman didn't concede whereas Theakston let in 2.
Sorry but you can clearly not take any banter or jokes on board, stop whining on so many threads pleaseExactly my point if we want to be as silly as to say 'Theakston for England!' then we might as well bring Seaman out of retirement instead.
Exactly my point if we want to be as silly as to say 'Theakston for England!' then we might as well bring Seaman out of retirement instead.
His name escapes me right now, but its the guy who retired with the bold head and crazy eyes, should clear it up, he was like the best referee.Could anyone tell me who the ref was by any chance? Cheers
Thats the oneCollina for the first half