So by your saying penalty's don't count as goals last i knew cup finals can be won on penalty's so off course penalty's count i mean look at Cristiano Ronaldo and how many penalty's he scores for Madrid does that make him any less of a goal scorer NO!!!!!
What cup finals has Jelavic scored in from a penalty shoot-out? None.
Also, I'm not saying that penalties don't count as goals so try not to read between the lines please. Goals scored from open play are harder to score than from a dead ball situation from 12 yards out with no one in front of you apart from the 'keeper. That's what I'm saying.
Ronaldo has taken 121 shots and scored 23 goals this season in La Liga. So does that mean Jelavic (or Hooper) is better than Ronaldo because of the shots per goal ratio? I don't think so because Ronaldo has scored 23 in only the LA LIGA where Jelvavic has scored only 16 in ALL Scottish competitions.
Hooper has done BETTER playing in the same competitions than Jelavic.
The reason Jelavic has had so many shots this season is most probably because he knows the rest of the Rangers team aren't up to the task of scoring goals apart from Naismith but he has been out for a long time now so yeah Jelavic is a bad player because he goes for goal :/
Where did I say he was a bad player because he went for goal?
I'm not dissing him for having so many shots either but what I AM saying is that his shots PER goal ratio is a lot worse than Hooper. He's only scored 16 times from 56 shots but yet he's classed by yourself as a far superior player than Hooper, who's scored 14 times out of 21 shots.
It's not the amount of shots you take - it's the end result that matters. Hooper has scored only two less goals than Jelavic with a LOT less shots taken. To me that is more prolific, which is a better striker/player.
I know above I mentioned Ronaldo's shot per goal ratio BUT, again, Ronaldo is playing for, arguably, the best team (or at least the second best team) in the world in, again arguably, the best league in the world. Jelavic (and Hooper) are in the SPL.
Suarez i will give you is a cracking player Kuyt mostly starts on the wing as well as Bellamy and Carroll is absolutely terrible imo and who will know more about were Jelavic will go you or his OWN Father?I will be very surprised if QPR go down Mark Hughes is a very good manager and with a reported £40 Million war chest to keep them up i fully expect him toEDIT: P.S. I'm NOT comparing Jelavic to Ronaldo what so ever before someone jumps on that!!!!!
I'll definitely give you Carroll because he is definitely not a £35m player. But Bellamy and Kuyt get used as strikers as well and both of these players are far better than Jelavic so would he even get a nod before these two? VERY doubtful. Suarez is only suspended for 8 games so he will be back not before too long, so, again, Jelavic won't get ahead of him. In my opinion there is no way Jelavic will go to Liverpool.
So because his father says that Jelavic is most likely to go to Liverpool means that he's on his way there does it? You don't actually think that his dad is acting like an agent and is basically touting Jelavic? Deluded if you don't think this to be honest because that is all his dad is doing - getting publicity for his son by saying that he'll end up with Liverpool.
He wishes. Oh, and Liverpool have denied that they are interested in Jelavic. I know a lot of clubs say things like that all the time but I'd take the word of Kenny Dalglish over Jelavic's dad.
Mark Hughes is a good manager, granted, but we are talking about a team that has won only 3 matches in their last 15 league games. Hughes may keep them up but it will be a huge ask and there's a huge difference between playing for Liverpool and playing for QPR and it's QPR that has made the inquiries into Jelavic - not Liverpool.
It's also looking more & more likely that he will be going to West Ham so kinda squashes his dad's story doesn't it.
) though, and MAYBE only just about £5M but even still with Hooper being better than Jelavic he would be worth more.
HMRC= Ibrokes.
)
