Christ, if these transfers happen, the team will certainly be more than capable of causing even more problems. They're physical as it is, have the ability to mix it up....have a feeling teams will not be relishing the trip to the Britannia. Or playing them at home.
They always own our defence every time we play them at the Britannia
Both would be good signings for Stoke. Between Pennant/Etheringthon's crosses and Delap's long-throw, Crouch will get goals. As for Palacios, he is a really good player at what he does and he is good enough for Tottenham still but 'arry needs to sell to buy so Wilson is being sacrificed.We've all made bad signings on FM, and Pulis is just proving that it can happen in real life too XD. Crouch we all know is painful I don't think anyone is arguing, but Jamie, believe me Palacios is bad too. If you want Stoke, have them for free
We've all made bad signings on FM, and Pulis is just proving that it can happen in real life too XD. Crouch we all know is painful I don't think anyone is arguing, but Jamie, believe me Palacios is bad too. If you want Stoke, have them for free
Sigh.
2 very good players if used properly. Personaly wouldn't sell Palacios for less that 10m, fantastic player and a fan favourite, just gone missing since his brother died. Think that he just needs a fresh start with an arm round his shoulder, added grit to our midfield when we needed him, but will be surplus should Diarra come in.
Of all of our strikers, I would rather keep Crouch surprisingly due to his threat in europe and for the fact that he has scored crucial goals when needed. Wouldb't sell him for less that 6m myself.
Rumours that the offer might be around 18m though, in which case, snap their hands off. Could finally have some money to strengthen our strike force and threaten it up.
Why would Stoke sign Palacios ? I know reason for Crouch, he's over 190cm, but why Palacios ?