Well.. no. Nasri played there about 3 times. Wenger tried several other options before looking at him to fill that spot. Wilshere, Diaby, RvP were all picked to fill Cesc's position ahead of Nasri. Unfortunately, none of them worked to the same extent, just as Nasri didn't which emphasises our reliance on Fabregas or at least someone like him (Ramsey, who is clearly his long-term replacement).
He can drive from deep very well, but what I'm saying is that unlike Scholes, and every other player who has played the 'Scholes role' has had a significantly better passing range and vision than Nasri has.
He's a straightforward #10, or a wide-forward for me. I think he'd struggle if he had a more creative (assisting) role to fill. He picked up 3 assists all season and made only 0.3 through-balls/game (although 1.9 key passes/game). He also completed (on avg) only 1.2 long balls/game compared to Fabregas (3.1), Wilshere (3.1), Ramsey (3). **** - Even DENILSON made more long-balls per game (1.9)!
Compare those stats to Utd: Scholes made an avg of 8.4 long balls/game, Fletcher and Rooney made 4.6 and Carrick made 4.4. You can say that's just about the different philosophies of Wenger and SAF but there is more to it than that IMO. Rooney and Giggs also made more through balls/game (0.5/0.3) and both also made more KPpg (2.1/2.4 respectively).
Think those are some interesting stats![]()
Again if he were to play there he wouldnt be playing the scholes roles, well aware of those stats, thats why i just came to those conclusions, but still capable of the playing CM, driving from the midfield and playing short passes off Rooney.
Scholes played so many deadly long balls because he no longer had the legs to get forwards like him his prime. Nasri is an intelligent enough player to adapt to a different game