sadly, but yes.
---------- Post added at 12:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:18 AM ----------
I mean, im not disappointed, i just expected others.
The Chelsea Thread
- Thread starter Ramires
- Start date
- Replies 35K
- Views 3M
sadly, but yes.
---------- Post added at 12:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:18 AM ----------
I mean, im not disappointed, i just expected others.
I didnt know what to expect, this is Chelsea and i have learnt to expected the unexpected. I mean i was in the mind set that Hiddink was going to be our manager and then boom, they throw in a curve ball and spend 15mill on a 33year old lol. I wont be dissapointed if we dont bring anyone in and i'll be as optamistic and hopefull as i have been at the start of the past 8 seasons.
Hopefully we have sence and will leave Modric alone and let Spurs come back next year when they need to sell and try and get us to take him for a price he is actually worth. I dont see major changes with Chelsea and i think we dont need major changes either.
I'm not sure because the fees were already agreed for both of them. And he did say in the next 8-10 days, so does he mean between the 8th and 10th day since the press conference? or in the next 10 days? Whether it is major signings or Courtois and Romeu at least he will have kept his word, I suppose.
---------- Post added 27/07/2011 at 12:07 AM ---------- Previous post was 26/07/2011 at 10:35 PM ----------
Gigi Salmon interviewing Courtois if anybody is interested. Was on Blues News at half 6 so, I think they added it in the past few hours because when I read the article earlier the video wasn't there.COURTOIS COMPLETED | Latest Chelsea News | Team & Transfer News | Chelsea FC | Chelsea
---------- Post added at 12:17 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:07 AM ----------
Kalou cam was even funnier y'day, hope they upload it to YouTube, the full video that it. Ah, in fact I've just realised that I think (think because there's a link in the description of one of the videos - YouTube - Broadcast Yourself) they have uploaded it to the Chelsea website, but you need to have Chelsea TV, which I have, but can't remember the password.
Last edited:
oh please its ok we did not get him, maybe he wont have fit into our system, right now I am more concerned about our midfield and look on the bright side, he is just further burdening City's books
oh please its ok we did not get him, maybe he wont have fit into our system, right now I am more concerned about our midfield and look on the bright side, he is just further burdening City's books
yeah you probably right.. dont care. lol JK, i kinda do. very talented guy.. i even preferred him over Neymar.
I couldnt believe how good his English was!!! It was better than Wengers without a doubt. On the Kalou thing i saw it and its one of the reasons we need to keep Kalou, everytime you see jokes being played its always Kalou involved and we need players like that. Plus he isent that bad of a footballer.
Im not that fussed, he is a sensational player yes but do we need him at the moment??? No i dont think we do.
Cute. For someone who apparently dislikes Wenger, you sure talk about him a lot. And what's wrong with Wenger's english?
Die in **** for saving Chelsea and making them the force they are now..
MisterStubbs
Member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2009
- Messages
- 3,514
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
It's amazing how fans forget the smallest of things isn't it.
okay seriously now, do we need a comedian or a world class footballer? maybe Ricky Gervais would be interested in this job, or maybe Jim Carrey? Isnt that bad? cmon man, at Chelsea we judging players by their qualities, not by 'he isnt that bad, he can stay', and Kalou isnt good enough to play for a club like us. okay, you know one thing i know another. every man has an opinion.
and the other thing about Kun, how can you possibly say that we DONT need a player like him? and how many times should I remind you that, except Torres, we dont have a world class striker? or forward or winger?
and for the last time (im hoping):
1. DROGBA? - isnet the same, just his name on the kit is the same.
2. ANELKA ? - yea right, exactly.
3. Malouda? - well thats easy, far far from being as good as Zhirkov, i mean by FAR.
4. Kalou -
5. Sturridge - okay, finally some talent, but would you take that risk of having just Sturridge?
6. oops. i wish we had 6.
so yeah, we dont need players
---------- Post added at 03:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:23 PM ----------
cmon guys you know what i mean.
ever heard something called a joke or banter for that matter?
some people are **** bent on blowing up the smallest of things out of proportion I suppose
1. DROGBA? - isnet the same, just his name on the kit is the same.
2. ANELKA ? - yea right, exactly.
3. Malouda? - well thats easy, far far from being as good as Zhirkov, i mean by FAR.
4. Kalou -
5. Sturridge - okay, finally some talent, but would you take that risk of having just Sturridge?
6. oops. i wish we had 6.
so yeah, we dont need players
---------- Post added at 03:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:23 PM ----------
cmon guys you know what i mean.
Funny how Malouda had the second highest statistical rating and Zhirkhov had the 16th highest last season then. Also, he isn't a striker, Agüero is, no comparison.
1. He wasn't kidding.
2. I don't even know where Wenger came from, did he just pull out a random name or has Wenger got something to do with the post he quoted?
lets pretend i was talking about forwards in general.
umm he was.... anyways there is no particular need to start some argument about one line from a post devoted to something entirely different