The Chelsea Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ramires
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 35K
  • Views Views 3M
Is somebody seriously trying to say that Josh McEachran is better than Jack Wilshere? Wow, just wow.. bias much?
 
Calum said:
off topic but i would rather have Per than Cahill as imo Per is much better.
Click to expand...

to be honest, you're going to say that.. on the other hand, I have no reason to be biased and I'm in the opinion that Gary Cahill is heads and shoulders above Per in terms of defending and going forward.
 
MisterStubbs said:
to be honest, you're going to say that.. on the other hand, I have no reason to be biased and I'm in the opinion that Gary Cahill is heads and shoulders above Per in terms of defending and going forward.
Click to expand...

Rather unfortunate choice of words, considering their relative heights...
 
Calum said:
off topic but i would rather have Per than Cahill as imo Per is much better.
Click to expand...

Of corse thats a matter of opinion but i dont agree at all. Although he has looked a little bit better he still looks pretty dodgy i.e Albrightons goal just last week.
 
Gary Cahill has been largely terrible this season, much like the rest of the side. But he has actually been the worst of the four. And i would rather have Mertesacker than Cahill, he has actually been doing his job.

And no McEachran isnt on the same level as wilshere, not even on the same level as cleverley. Your cant even talk about potential because he is playing so few games
 
Mike. said:
Gary Cahill has been largely terrible this season, much like the rest of the side. But he has actually been the worst of the four. And i would rather have Mertesacker than Cahill, he has actually been doing his job.

And no McEachran isnt on the same level as wilshere, not even on the same level as cleverley. Your cant even talk about potential because he is playing so few games
Click to expand...

Don't sugar coat it Mike.
 
Gary Cahill is quite possibly the best CB to ever grace the Premier League.
 
Subtle said:
Don't sugar coat it Mike.
Click to expand...

Haha, im not one to mince my words. He's a good player who has been terrible this season. If he plays like this for Chelsea he'll be a liability rather than a good buy
 
Josh McEachran is going to be class. As for Cahill, never really stood out for me but that is a decent fee. Will be okay backup for Terry.
 
Now now. Let's all just stop being so angry and just picture in our minds the soothing image of the World's Slowest Centre-Back Pairing(TM)​ featuring John Terry and Gary Cahill.

Up against Agbonlahor or Walcott, preferably.
 
Mike. said:
Gary Cahill has been largely terrible this season, much like the rest of the side. But he has actually been the worst of the four. And i would rather have Mertesacker than Cahill, he has actually been doing his job.

And no McEachran isnt on the same level as wilshere, not even on the same level as cleverley. Your cant even talk about potential because he is playing so few games
Click to expand...


This season he has been very poor in a very poor side agreed. But take this season out the equasion and he has been very good thats why i believe (hope if we sign him) his head was turned when the Spurs bid came in late in the summer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top