TheRealMourinho
Member
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2009
- Messages
- 922
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 16
Chelsea have become the first team to beat Arsenal THREE times at the Emirates Stadium in the Premier League. #CFC
So, bring me up to date. I've been without internet and TV for a while. I gather Vic's been playing well and Ramires looked at home in a double pivot?
I promise not to say 'I knew it' if I'm right.
+ he loses the ball way too much.
Yeah, they'll need time to adapt to playing as a pair but there's definitely potential. The only real issue is that Ramires' passing isn't quite good enough. It will be a very solid pivot until Oscar is ready though.
I will admit i questioned whether Ramires could play that role but he is proving me wrong. Has played 3 games there now in a row and has been quite sensational. Give it 5-10 games with Mikel and Rammy and that could be a real effective partnership. What i have noticed is that although he can't do that deep lying playmaker role because his passing range is limited what he does do is win the ball back and then runs with it at pace starting counter attacks. So many times yesterday we forced Arsenal into mistakes by pressing them all over the pitch and then breaking forward in numbers and Ramires done this countless number of times.
Also don't think he gives the ball away as much as you think Nick mate, 92% pass completion today which was our joint second highest of the starting 11 only behind JT. (joint with Mata and Oscar). He also won 5/5 tackles today so he is winning me round indeed.
One big factor of our win was our how much we got Torres involved in the game. Against Stoke he received just 24 passes but yesterday he received 42!!!
Also just to put it out there... RDM drops Lampard and receives no problems but when AVB did it, he splits the dressing room. Shows that it was AVB's man-management rather than Lampard that was the problem.
Also just to put it out there... RDM drops Lampard and receives no problems but when AVB did it, he splits the dressing room. Shows that it was AVB's man-management rather than Lampard that was the problem.
The difference is Di Matteo is a Chelsea legend, AVB wasn't. Lampard would of been very foolish to kick up a storm against Di Matteo when they are WINNING and when he is such a Chelsea icon. With AVB, Lampard knew the fans were not happy and he was under scrutiny due to average results, so it was a good time to do it.
Yes because it's lampards aim to create chaos and disorder in the squad... And anways your wrong as AVB was winning at that time when Lampard was unhappy
It's Lampard aim to be playing reguarly, and if we were winning at the time that he got dropped does it not give him more of a reason to want to be playing?
We are winning now... He has not said/done anything
Much easier for a club legend to drop a club legend, and even then he took his time, when it was obvious it shoud have happened earlier. Come on now, you've been seriously bias on your feeling re Lampard and AVB. It split the dressing room because Lampard kicked up, and who was going to get the backing?
My issue has never been whether Lampard deservesto be dropped. The answer is clear to that question. I just feel their is a noticeable difference in the way these 2 respective managers handled te situation. While AVB just dropped Lampard suddenly without communicating the situation properly to him unlike RDM. Yes what Lampard did subsequently was wrong and that undermined AVB but AVB could have avoided the situation if he had managed it better in my opinion.